IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [newtrk] Last Call comments on draft-ietf-newtrk-decruft-experiment-01.txt

Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Tue, 15 November 2005 20:38 UTC

Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ec7ZG-0007Ax-Vv for newtrk-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:38:15 -0500
Received: from mailapps.uoregon.edu (mailapps.uoregon.edu [128.223.142.45]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA24612 for <newtrk-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 15:37:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailapps.uoregon.edu (IDENT:U2FsdGVkX1/In4LDF4+uEekJy7DIYN1XKTTKr7wusN0@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailapps.uoregon.edu (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAFKZ5Fd009880; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 12:35:05 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by mailapps.uoregon.edu (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id jAFKZ5Q9009879; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 12:35:05 -0800
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no (eikenes.alvestrand.no [158.38.152.233]) by mailapps.uoregon.edu (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAFKZ48C009874 for <newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu>; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 12:35:05 -0800
Received: from localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D73E2596DB; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 21:34:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29985-03; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 21:34:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from halvestr-w2k02.emea.cisco.com (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id B33BE2596D7; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 21:34:31 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 12:25:28 -0800
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
Cc: New Track <newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu>, iana@iana.org
Subject: Re: [newtrk] Last Call comments on draft-ietf-newtrk-decruft-experiment-01.txt
Message-ID: <4E990BC2326BBA09D9EB3F20@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126>
In-Reply-To: <437A2E4E.3020704@cisco.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10511151035230.29978-100000@shell4.bayarea.net> <437A2E4E.3020704@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.3 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="==========6C1E17CA307D269B953A=========="
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87.1, clamav-milter version 0.87 on mailapps
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Sender: owner-newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu
Precedence: bulk


--On 15. november 2005 19:51 +0100 Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:

> C. M. Heard wrote:
>> Why is decruft a special case that requires special handling
>> regarding references?
>
> Just by numbers.  It's the only document that changes the status of so
> many standards.  That might not remain the case in the future, but it
> might.  This is why I'd like to hear from the IANA on the matter.

I talked to Michelle in Vancouver, and she was very happy with a resolution 
that did not require her to do anything......

                  Harald

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email