IETF Logo Mail Archive

[nfsv4] one umask-02 question

Mike Kupfer <mike.kupfer@oracle.com> Thu, 01 December 2016 20:32 UTC

Return-Path: <mike.kupfer@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 319031299D9 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:32:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wkrCA5PLVPNl for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:31:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E7B7129BCF for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:16:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from userv0021.oracle.com (userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id uB1KGnPA028718 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 20:16:49 GMT
Received: from athyra-vm1.us.oracle.com (athyra-vm1.us.oracle.com [10.132.144.25]) by userv0021.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id uB1KGmlg013086 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 20:16:49 GMT
Received: from athyra-vm1.us.oracle.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by athyra-vm1.us.oracle.com (8.15.2+Sun/8.15.2) with ESMTP id uB1KAlbC003472 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:10:47 -0800 (PST)
From: Mike Kupfer <mike.kupfer@oracle.com>
To: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+mdk01; nmh 1.2; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 12:10:47 -0800
Message-ID: <3471.1480623047@athyra-vm1.us.oracle.com>
X-Source-IP: userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/5eKI0EuR_RBpYIhcI2xLzWBfJJ4>
Subject: [nfsv4] one umask-02 question
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2016 20:32:01 -0000

Section 3 has

>    The server MUST ignore any mode attribute set in the same operation
>    as mode_umask.

I don't understand why the server doesn't return an error in this case.
Silently throwing stuff away makes me nervous.  (If this was already
discussed, feel free to just give me a pointer to the discussion.)

thanks,
mike

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email