IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] one umask-02 question

Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com> Fri, 02 December 2016 20:32 UTC

Return-Path: <agruenba@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B221293DF for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 12:32:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d2CqZb5Wxna1 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 12:32:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua0-f171.google.com (mail-ua0-f171.google.com [209.85.217.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10E9B1293DA for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 12:32:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua0-f171.google.com with SMTP id b35so292655629uaa.3 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Fri, 02 Dec 2016 12:32:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Q2kRt+VD1EXZ5ODDVak+6uI6plTk8ftyzRxgioRt9vM=; b=Eoo3ukFdVzdz6nMA/KqUnf/mNw+Lypw7K7n0ooXCbHtU/TOZMYgGg9I3LRrZZUHE8H 8PClSNwSKjDl7eKALDzG9Y+lzjZTKN9rPyD9HA1o9cXDRK3g4+ccnrqXUX6VBFpvY0nD UtAeoarKr/kHUR0EqUsa7S8RavbeaRdX7hdhQp9JpzU6ms3bIL8AU2SrgpSmypV7PKPh mYn5y1iYlDtrNnR2HRH+LBU0ke0MpUKymiu5SNtZrMByfCov5yRmigrPiRzva0C90hT6 z8TpfemjgQTu6O0W3mK9Bnd2sJgx1dita3DHAuVlOryOZ44xpKtUSvIZWTWCQPjHIbfB 6mmw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC01RhgJ9yQt51n2I/27668VR3F4ta6JMqB7UlGbjOo+xqTxCtudLTDqkPrW4P4Pma2fo1mU5E5cKSsPqycS8
X-Received: by 10.159.34.42 with SMTP id 39mr35362948uad.84.1480710741154; Fri, 02 Dec 2016 12:32:21 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.176.81.33 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 12:32:20 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5607.1480708786@athyra-vm1.us.oracle.com>
References: <3471.1480623047@athyra-vm1.us.oracle.com> <CADaq8jeHsqRi8PEJPVs0uma_9TjGrFVj=-yq-4NF-9awX6wP0g@mail.gmail.com> <20161201220137.GA1589@fieldses.org> <CAHc6FU6OkNWi1HP79auC10pqF03DJcm2kExNLhg9z-ofDRjmYA@mail.gmail.com> <5607.1480708786@athyra-vm1.us.oracle.com>
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 21:32:20 +0100
Message-ID: <CAHc6FU54yTFrMR-O=r-wY0os-UgViRpb_U9kijkN+LDNZW6EJA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike Kupfer <mike.kupfer@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/EihYfJggi2kWunU21f4W6ykxYLY>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>, "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] one umask-02 question
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 20:32:28 -0000

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Mike Kupfer <mike.kupfer@oracle.com> wrote:
> Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
>
>> returning INVAL will always require
>> additional code that doesn't actually add any benefits.
>
> The benefit comes in when trying to troubleshoot unexpected behavior.

Okay.

Thanks,
Andreas

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email