IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] Possible need for wg meeting in or after IETF 114

Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Thu, 02 June 2022 17:24 UTC

Return-Path: <hch@lst.de>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3714C14F74F; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 10:24:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x5zSjFlAaHAA; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 10:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from verein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2E47C14CF0E; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 10:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id C9BB068AFE; Thu, 2 Jun 2022 19:24:00 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 19:24:00 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, "Noveck, David" <David.Noveck=40netapp.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org" <nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org>, "nfsv4-ads@ietf.org" <nfsv4-ads@ietf.org>, "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20220602172400.GA15893@lst.de>
References: <MN2PR06MB5597860F139142B4E5601803E1DC9@MN2PR06MB5597.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <38D9A018-27A3-4597-9784-F63F1F756664@oracle.com> <20220602165420.GA14677@lst.de> <513134B3-BDDF-418B-8634-50CC15BA5FB8@oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <513134B3-BDDF-418B-8634-50CC15BA5FB8@oracle.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/BCIxU0YLL4m0OVJt5N-iUtQ7kPQ>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Possible need for wg meeting in or after IETF 114
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 17:24:09 -0000

On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 05:05:09PM +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> > We just need someone with enough interest to replace the reference
> > to the NVMe to SCSI translation spec/whitepaper with proper normative
> > text.
> 
> Is this something that can be handled via e-mail, or do we need f2f?

I think we just need patches against the current draft text in this
git repository:

http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/scsi-layout-nvme.git

we've had conceptual agreement on what to do for a long time, just
no one found time to actually do it.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email