Re: [nfsv4] Possible need for wg meeting in or after IETF 114

["Noveck, David" <[e-mail]>]

> We just need someone with enough interest to replace the reference to the NVMe to SCSI translation spec/whitepaper with proper normative text. 

We also need  a base i-d, to which that replacement can be applied.   Please submit it before 7/13 so we can discuss this need at the meeting.

>  In them meantime the biggest part of the Linux implementation of this draft did land upstream already :)

Except the draft doesn't exist ☹  That makes interoperability testing hard.

-----Original Message-----
From: Christoph Hellwig <[e-mail]> 
Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2022 12:54 PM
To: Chuck Lever III <[e-mail]>
Cc: Noveck, David <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Possible need for wg meeting in or after IETF 114

NetApp Security WARNING: This is an external email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.




On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 01:56:03PM +0000, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> > I'd like to get working group input regarding:
> > - what you would be be willing and able to lead a discussion of
> > - what you want to hear discussed and possibly contribute to
> > - whether there are scheduling or other considerations that argue for an IETF meeting (7/23-7/29) or a post-IETF114 interim several weeks later.
>
> One more item I'd like to discuss: Is there /any/ way to get the pNFS 
> with NVMe layout draft unstuck?

We just need someone with enough interest to replace the reference to the NVMe to SCSI translation spec/whitepaper with proper normative text.  In them meantime the biggest part of the Linux implementation of this draft did land upstream already :)