IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8881 (6865)

Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com> Mon, 14 March 2022 22:33 UTC

Return-Path: <csmiley@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E513A0B90 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 15:33:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OTNW7lpq_uvu for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 15:33:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84A773A0B7B for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 15:33:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62480427C642; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 15:33:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0EPibmyh17fu; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 15:33:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.16] (cpe-76-95-228-63.socal.res.rr.com [76.95.228.63]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 16399425A344; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 15:33:51 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20220228133021.C55343BA85@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 15:33:50 -0700
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9613334A-4A56-4EB0-BE7A-F5C935E95102@amsl.com>
References: <20220228133021.C55343BA85@rfc-editor.org>
To: dnoveck@netapp.com, chuck.lever@oracle.com, martin.h.duke@gmail.com, Zaheduzzaman Sarker <Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com>, davenoveck@gmail.com, beepee@gmail.com, nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/IScN5poq_yUYgG4Be2sicvjM7Ck>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8881 (6865)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 22:33:56 -0000

Greetings,

This errata reports a problem with Section 15.25.4/RFC 8881.  Upon further review, we believe it should point to Section 18.25.4/RFC 8881. We have updated accordingly.  Please let us know any concerns. 

Please note - this report still needs to be reviewed by the stream approver.

Thank you.

RFC Editor/cs


> On Feb 28, 2022, at 5:30 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8881,
> "Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1 Protocol".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6865
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
> 
> Section: 15.25.4
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> The server MUST NOT delete the directory entry if the reply from 
> OPEN had 
> the flag OPEN4_RESULT_PRESERVE_UNLINKED set.
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> If the reply from OPEN had the flag OPEN4_RESULT_PRESERVE_UNLINKED set,
> The server 
> MUST NOI delete the file contents until each directory entry is 
> deleted and the file is no longer open.
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The existing second and third bullets are directly contradictory.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8881 (draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns-04)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1 Protocol
> Publication Date    : August 2020
> Author(s)           : D. Noveck, Ed., C. Lever
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Network File System Version 4
> Area                : Transport
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email