IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8881 (6865)

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> Tue, 15 March 2022 00:32 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4A313A12D9 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 17:32:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6yzSy_BCJoUv for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 17:32:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB9493A12D5 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Mar 2022 17:32:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kduck.mit.edu ([24.16.140.251]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.12.4) with ESMTP id 22F0Voim025592 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 14 Mar 2022 20:31:55 -0400
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 17:31:50 -0700
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
To: Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com>
Cc: dnoveck@netapp.com, chuck.lever@oracle.com, martin.h.duke@gmail.com, Zaheduzzaman Sarker <Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com>, davenoveck@gmail.com, beepee@gmail.com, nfsv4@ietf.org, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-ID: <20220315003150.GN27834@kduck.mit.edu>
References: <20220228133021.C55343BA85@rfc-editor.org> <9613334A-4A56-4EB0-BE7A-F5C935E95102@amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9613334A-4A56-4EB0-BE7A-F5C935E95102@amsl.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/xxZvalvGgpGyodX5SuxFjCxBqM0>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8881 (6865)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 00:32:12 -0000

Presumably we also want s/MUST NOI/MUST NOT/ in the new text, as well.

-Ben

On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 03:33:50PM -0700, Chris Smiley wrote:
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> This errata reports a problem with Section 15.25.4/RFC 8881.  Upon further review, we believe it should point to Section 18.25.4/RFC 8881. We have updated accordingly.  Please let us know any concerns. 
> 
> Please note - this report still needs to be reviewed by the stream approver.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> RFC Editor/cs
> 
> 
> > On Feb 28, 2022, at 5:30 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> > 
> > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8881,
> > "Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1 Protocol".
> > 
> > --------------------------------------
> > You may review the report below and at:
> > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6865
> > 
> > --------------------------------------
> > Type: Technical
> > Reported by: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
> > 
> > Section: 15.25.4
> > 
> > Original Text
> > -------------
> > The server MUST NOT delete the directory entry if the reply from 
> > OPEN had 
> > the flag OPEN4_RESULT_PRESERVE_UNLINKED set.
> > 
> > Corrected Text
> > --------------
> > If the reply from OPEN had the flag OPEN4_RESULT_PRESERVE_UNLINKED set,
> > The server 
> > MUST NOI delete the file contents until each directory entry is 
> > deleted and the file is no longer open.
> > 
> > Notes
> > -----
> > The existing second and third bullets are directly contradictory.
> > 
> > Instructions:
> > -------------
> > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> > 
> > --------------------------------------
> > RFC8881 (draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns-04)
> > --------------------------------------
> > Title               : Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1 Protocol
> > Publication Date    : August 2020
> > Author(s)           : D. Noveck, Ed., C. Lever
> > Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> > Source              : Network File System Version 4
> > Area                : Transport
> > Stream              : IETF
> > Verifying Party     : IESG
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email