IETF Logo Mail Archive

[nfsv4] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8881 (6865)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 28 February 2022 13:30 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 794263A11F5 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 05:30:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EqJcKtAMEvj3 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 05:30:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94A933A11F4 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 05:30:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 499) id C55343BA85; Mon, 28 Feb 2022 05:30:21 -0800 (PST)
To: dnoveck@netapp.com, chuck.lever@oracle.com, martin.h.duke@gmail.com, Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com, davenoveck@gmail.com, beepee@gmail.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: davenoveck@gmail.com, nfsv4@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220228133021.C55343BA85@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 05:30:21 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/zJRDcx8_y1UUH8nOyQj_wexUbyc>
Subject: [nfsv4] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8881 (6865)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 13:30:28 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8881,
"Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1 Protocol".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6865

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>

Section: 15.25.4

Original Text
-------------
The server MUST NOT delete the directory entry if the reply from 
OPEN had 
the flag OPEN4_RESULT_PRESERVE_UNLINKED set.

Corrected Text
--------------
If the reply from OPEN had the flag OPEN4_RESULT_PRESERVE_UNLINKED set,
The server 
MUST NOI delete the file contents until each directory entry is 
deleted and the file is no longer open.

Notes
-----
The existing second and third bullets are directly contradictory.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC8881 (draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns-04)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1 Protocol
Publication Date    : August 2020
Author(s)           : D. Noveck, Ed., C. Lever
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Network File System Version 4
Area                : Transport
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email