IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-nfsv4-lfs-registry-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Tom Haynes <thomas.haynes@primarydata.com> Thu, 09 April 2015 17:52 UTC

Return-Path: <thomas.haynes@primarydata.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 437E51B3030 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 10:52:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4uulTv5Z8ST5 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 10:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-f176.google.com (mail-pd0-f176.google.com [209.85.192.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A33F1B3032 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 10:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pdea3 with SMTP id a3so160457902pde.3 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 10:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=mb1DxXPgjOJsuMbygGEAXV87Eg3IzaSqied0NLuvbCg=; b=XF2PCmshViBb3NeYtHEcoMJQxf25EDh4cZF850ZZAsTPJfhKpUAQQ+/7JDQJQR/q2u aUnmJatTgdphpNNRslF7p4IWsrnIzJtY73IjfU/6Qb0vaFDvT3NJAAcY/j+bqmx5vCsU 5Ao2awbmLsC84W70ISmdgjm2MwOUVY3sSu1R04Gmnqmwqw/jiQD7IPkya5e+SKsNSTth kUW+AFgZGfWfhy239vQsEy/DJMlwrPu3k3LwVRzUkIN/o4t+opoJh67tNrdse1JSyEC4 VW0/qxnQlJhm96DfEkQzbk1Ho2qWOefdzWK+PktDMtEEN0jPpbOSO+KQDQxdXBBM7jz3 Xlaw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQloehSUIalblBjv/LHvxqSksO794JDiLY5bIrm58sHdNcVzO92pM44rr3kzA1155xqFawzc
X-Received: by 10.70.98.233 with SMTP id el9mr10838356pdb.54.1428601911116; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 10:51:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.30.8.5] ([50.242.95.105]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id md2sm14975868pbc.13.2015.04.09.10.51.50 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Apr 2015 10:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C29B6428-7B1E-4485-876F-7859FE88078B"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
From: Tom Haynes <thomas.haynes@primarydata.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJJLzNxejpUQTnbftHD63T=GLmp8AL-y0ySCoXF35-du+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 10:51:48 -0700
Message-Id: <528C9EE6-00A7-4C51-B3C4-648F67B2CEE9@primarydata.com>
References: <20150407154310.383.14870.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAD39596-FC66-492E-9E5B-1C2866632295@primarydata.com> <D94C6AB3-D072-4D76-9A43-0362BDA83B18@primarydata.com> <ED37251F-453E-4379-9E9B-6D8E75BC9E99@gmail.com> <DF1E4044-7D42-4715-891F-4D32B8A0F4F9@primarydata.com> <44423013-37AF-4E25-BF1A-92C671DBF2BE@gmail.com> <CALaySJJLzNxejpUQTnbftHD63T=GLmp8AL-y0ySCoXF35-du+A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/chW67pNcbbCceh8dGUL29AZZZSo>
Cc: RJ Atkinson <rja.lists@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-nfsv4-lfs-registry-04: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 17:52:05 -0000

> On Apr 9, 2015, at 8:51 AM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
> 
>>> New paragraph:
>>> 
>>> In reviewing the published label format specification, the Designated Expert
>>> should consider whether or not the specification provides sufficient
>>> semantics for the object and subject labels to enforce the MAC model
>>> and policy administration when deployed within an organization. Another
>>> consideration is if the label format allows a correct and complete
>>> implementation of the protocol to process and enforce labels as a
>>> policy administration mechanism. Finally, to reduce interoperability
>>> issues, the review must determine if the new label format specification
>>> has clearly defined syntax and semantics for the proposed new labels.
>> 
>> That text looks great to me.
> 
> And to me.  Pop that in, and I'll clear the discuss tout de suite.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Barry


Thanks for help:

A new version (-05) has been submitted for draft-ietf-nfsv4-lfs-registry:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nfsv4-lfs-registry-05.txt <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-nfsv4-lfs-registry-05.txt>


The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-lfs-registry/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-lfs-registry/>

Diff from previous version:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-nfsv4-lfs-registry-05 <http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-nfsv4-lfs-registry-05>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email