IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] rough consensus and the read sparse I-D RE: nfsv4.x

Spencer Shepler <sshepler@microsoft.com> Fri, 10 September 2010 22:54 UTC

Return-Path: <sshepler@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99A593A6B53 for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.426
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.426 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.173, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5yqL+HXE4YrS for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:54:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.microsoft.com (smtp.microsoft.com [131.107.115.215]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907393A6958 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:54:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TK5EX14CASC129.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.52.7) by TK5-EXGWY-E802.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:54:29 -0700
Received: from TK5EX14MBXC126.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.11.142]) by TK5EX14CASC129.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.52.7]) with mapi id 14.01.0218.012; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 15:54:29 -0700
From: Spencer Shepler <sshepler@microsoft.com>
To: "david.noveck@emc.com" <david.noveck@emc.com>, "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [nfsv4] rough consensus and the read sparse I-D RE: nfsv4.x
Thread-Index: AQHLUTZDMUQeZ+YmRUGO0RX91Iy8RJML0kvQ
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 22:54:28 +0000
Message-ID: <E043D9D8EE3B5743B8B174A814FD584F09C3F53B@TK5EX14MBXC126.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <E043D9D8EE3B5743B8B174A814FD584F09C3F21A@TK5EX14MBXC126.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <BF3BB6D12298F54B89C8DCC1E4073D80026650BF@CORPUSMX50A.corp.emc.com>
In-Reply-To: <BF3BB6D12298F54B89C8DCC1E4073D80026650BF@CORPUSMX50A.corp.emc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.76]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] rough consensus and the read sparse I-D RE: nfsv4.x
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 22:54:41 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: david.noveck@emc.com [mailto:david.noveck@emc.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 3:19 PM
> To: Spencer Shepler; nfsv4@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [nfsv4] rough consensus and the read sparse I-D RE: nfsv4.x
> 
> > however, it is up to the co-chairs
> > to determine the best method of rough consensus for the group, etc.
> 
> And other things?  What other things might be included in that?  Maybe you
> think I'm paranoid,  but I'd argue that a sole-discretion-phobia is not
> necessarily dysfunctional.

My impression is that you are pre-optimizing.  My suggestion is to
raise a question if a future rough consensus decisions seems inappropriate.

My attempt in providing earlier comments about NFSv4.x was to
provide for a wider range of activity than what had been occurring. 

Spencer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email