[nfsv4] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-nfsv4-multi-domain-fs-reqs-09: (with COMMENT)

"Kathleen Moriarty" <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 29 August 2016 15:55 UTC

Return-Path: <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietf.org
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A09A712D125; Mon, 29 Aug 2016 08:55:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Kathleen Moriarty <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.31.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <147248612861.19098.9168778407703490987.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 08:55:28 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/ml7-S9Qa82cYL3tHdZ-CT3ddFo4>
Cc: nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org, nfsv4@ietf.org, draft-ietf-nfsv4-multi-domain-fs-reqs@ietf.org
Subject: [nfsv4] Kathleen Moriarty's No Objection on draft-ietf-nfsv4-multi-domain-fs-reqs-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 15:55:28 -0000

Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-nfsv4-multi-domain-fs-reqs-09: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-multi-domain-fs-reqs/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for following the advice in the SecDir review:
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir/current/msg06652.html

I think the draft could be a bit more clear, following Russ' comments a
bit further.  I had similar questions in this version, but then read his
review and the responses.  I'll leave this as a comment for the AD since
my comments would be similar to those already made.  If the draft could
read a bit better, that would be helpful.