IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] NFSv4 WG meeting in Berlin?

Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Mon, 02 May 2016 19:26 UTC

Return-Path: <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B87D12D17A for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 May 2016 12:26:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.216
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.216 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DgHLkeS9OAPq for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 May 2016 12:26:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8E0C12D179 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 May 2016 12:26:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from userv0021.oracle.com (userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id u42JQZwD017618 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 2 May 2016 19:26:36 GMT
Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by userv0021.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u42JQZBm017136 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 2 May 2016 19:26:35 GMT
Received: from abhmp0010.oracle.com (abhmp0010.oracle.com [141.146.116.16]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u42JQYi0006459; Mon, 2 May 2016 19:26:35 GMT
Received: from anon-dhcp-171.1015granger.net (/68.46.169.226) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Mon, 02 May 2016 12:26:34 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <CO2PR03MB2280CF567A3E019FC230CAF8C7790@CO2PR03MB2280.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 15:26:33 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <4A5DDEA4-8B52-4D4B-978E-A6301D54C7FF@oracle.com>
References: <CO2PR03MB2280CF567A3E019FC230CAF8C7790@CO2PR03MB2280.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
To: Spencer Shepler <sshepler@microsoft.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
X-Source-IP: userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/ncaq5mxiVTQ62E384nNouFAoAg8>
Cc: "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] NFSv4 WG meeting in Berlin?
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 19:26:38 -0000

> On May 2, 2016, at 12:18 PM, Spencer Shepler <sshepler@microsoft.com> wrote:
> 
>  
> Working Group scheduling has opened for Berlin.
>  
> From the dates to know section of the meeting our request is due June 3rd….
>  
> 2016-06-03 (Friday): Cut-off date for requests to schedule Working Group meetings
>  
> If we want to meet, I propose that we have a draft working group agenda pulled together by May 20th.
>  
> Therefore, please submit agenda items, etc. before then.

I can propose a number of topics related to NFS-over-RDMA.
Any or all of these would be appropriate for a f2f
discussion, depending on interest.

- progress report on RFC 5666bis and bidirectional
   RPC-over-RDMA, and review of final steps

- progress report on RFC 5667bis, which should be open by
   then, and discussion of direction for this work

- discussion of items related to RPC-over-RDMA Version One
   follow-on work, including:

   + RPC-over-RDMA Version Two
   + draft-dnoveck-nfsv4-rpcrdma-rtissues-00
   + draft-dnoveck-nfsv4-rpcrdma-xcharext-00
   + Priorities for work on optional features

- proposals related to pNFS block and NVMe/F

- proposals related to NFS-over-RDMA and remote persistent
   memory


> Also, if anyone has a proposal to change the decision date, please speak up.


--
Chuck Lever

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email