IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-mv0-trunking-update-04.txt

Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Fri, 01 February 2019 17:09 UTC

Return-Path: <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6233F1310C7; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 09:09:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.853
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.853 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-4.553, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1_xZHxz67jzM; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 09:09:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from userp2130.oracle.com (userp2130.oracle.com [156.151.31.86]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 557391310C9; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 09:09:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (userp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by userp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id x11H9ZiP140391; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 17:09:42 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=content-type : mime-version : subject : from : in-reply-to : date : cc : content-transfer-encoding : message-id : references : to; s=corp-2018-07-02; bh=zqbwiT530Et5WqEYLLfHvM6V637r3SEt47c2mJwy6CE=; b=fZV5+LxI1r2NTyPvfXg3ZKId6t8wwg7Rp5lmyRkIFd49Op2Pe5LXuFTbiWw9ixmMPCfy sjm7lRaRPB7XJ4yAFKnuh23wUFRQ+Ft93WyDJ1dt8D7UEwVcPEXgETQZJd0c+UhE/m00 MIwIPior+gLBUb6Hu97yZYYGYb/6HHFfDc/3R4g17K2X42/0qZS8u6TOZ453ppwrYKyD l6Zg760ufz8vG+ARvHSsBcdKDkUPvZyLQHh2yVbz9WYDmssFiPsStFkCXP5XVTbUkeYJ lERnT+NIVzqvQG7EhXnNoJ03oqT+hDEp1Q+yMiLOo4d96bfwi69gWFegOYMP/eEcTNHJ Hw==
Received: from userv0022.oracle.com (userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74]) by userp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2q8eyuyujk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 01 Feb 2019 17:09:41 +0000
Received: from aserv0122.oracle.com (aserv0122.oracle.com [141.146.126.236]) by userv0022.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x11H9etU016512 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 1 Feb 2019 17:09:41 GMT
Received: from abhmp0006.oracle.com (abhmp0006.oracle.com [141.146.116.12]) by aserv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x11H9eqr024470; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 17:09:40 GMT
Received: from anon-dhcp-171.1015granger.net (/68.61.232.219) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Fri, 01 Feb 2019 09:09:40 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <20190201170533.GJ93251@kduck.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2019 12:09:38 -0500
Cc: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, draft-ietf-nfsv4-mv0-trunking-update@ietf.org, nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <A0090122-B1D9-4C27-8C5A-9F2F511418A6@oracle.com>
References: <154903185895.28504.17927048108992520591@ietfa.amsl.com> <06AE6508-A280-418C-81E3-EEA0EF961627@oracle.com> <20190201170533.GJ93251@kduck.mit.edu>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=9154 signatures=668682
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=830 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1902010126
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/zwEwRfwV6Xxpvb3Gwrv1QXgi4GA>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-mv0-trunking-update-04.txt
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2019 17:09:49 -0000


> On Feb 1, 2019, at 12:05 PM, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 09:44:11AM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Revision -04 attempts to address the outstanding DISCUSS and COMMENT
>> ballot positions. An XML comment requests RFC Editor attention to the
> 
> It does so [*], and I've cleared in the datatracker.
> 
>> concern about "this document" v. "the current document".
> 
> Excellent; thank you.
> 
> -Benjamin
> 
> 
> [*] I think Section 5.2.3 was going to go with "need to support multiple
> connection types" as well as the other changes made.

This sentence?

   Because of the need to support multiple connections, clients face the
   issue of determining the proper connection type to use when
   establishing a connection to a server network address.

I think you are correct, sorry for the oversight. I can either submit
another revision with this change or communicate the change to the RFC
Editor during AUTH48.

--
Chuck Lever

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email