Re: [NGO] NETCONF-related sessions at IETF 70
John Dickinson <jad@jadickinson.co.uk> Tue, 27 November 2007 09:54 UTC
Return-path: <ngo-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iwx8k-0006kF-DN; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 04:54:02 -0500
Received: from ngo by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Iwx8j-0006jj-NJ for ngo-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 04:54:01 -0500
Received: from ngo by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Iwx8j-0006jZ-E6 for ngo@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 04:54:01 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Iwwtb-0001Pa-Lv for ngo@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 04:38:23 -0500
Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.169]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IwwtZ-0000AW-4z for ngo@ietf.org; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 04:38:23 -0500
Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so456842uge for <ngo@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 01:38:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer:sender; bh=brBqAVNpRRgGVHVVzM3tZC7UaaYeA3sxTeQhDx/T7ug=; b=mXpb26AUu9XtUo/QlyuQB2zghJtEH3cytPpWJrplENl4jPuz8GOrtqu9rPhqqoHF+XvqWeLXi3sEDcYPLYQRK0jvR4PCaSDxV6V0vP2uy4URi97S10MB9CXCQW+8K3CEqxlgdBt+RHpgAfFodgZCAjnsIEw5UYdVrWLE5nijG58=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=received:cc:message-id:from:to:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references:x-mailer:sender; b=Go9r/cFIPXFam/PZQJ8edWnXMG0Y8bd7LonSdFsDdFd8T9RQQueQYSbzHeU6UeyiY9nK0+XKHWGsmK4KJ2eMs7rQpHnDEgDNzM2qiEg76DFN2UgeOKvdzLOS7y829HLq7mRo+1n+iGI72kNpizQzyDouRZN6qFzzWiBhFVQhogs=
Received: by 10.67.19.11 with SMTP id w11mr558344ugi.1196156300147; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 01:38:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?192.168.1.75? ( [195.72.179.98]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b35sm252149ugd.2007.11.27.01.38.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 01:38:18 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <8C1259C3-737F-4E9C-8585-1D10E0162368@jadickinson.co.uk>
From: John Dickinson <jad@jadickinson.co.uk>
To: netconf@ops.ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <200711260521.lAQ5LWaq008411@idle.juniper.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915)
Subject: Re: [NGO] NETCONF-related sessions at IETF 70
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 09:38:16 +0000
References: <200711260521.lAQ5LWaq008411@idle.juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 769a46790fb42fbb0b0cc700c82f7081
X-TMDA-Confirmed: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 04:54:01 -0500
Cc: ngo@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ngo@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETCONF Goes On - discussions on future work and extensions to NETCONF <ngo.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo>, <mailto:ngo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ngo>
List-Post: <mailto:ngo@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ngo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo>, <mailto:ngo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ngo-bounces@ietf.org
On 26 Nov 2007, at 05:21, Phil Shafer wrote: > "Sharon Chisholm" writes: >> Either that or for more detailed discussion of the items in the >> updated >> NETCONF charter. > > Another thought is to come up with a list of the five biggest > impediments to NETCONF's complete domination of the configuration > space. Do we know the answers to questions like: > > - Why aren't/won't device folks shipping netconf implementations? > - Why aren't/won't application writers moving to NETCONF? > - Why isn't NETCONF becoming the answer to configuration problems? > - What's stopping it? > - Where's the chicken? > - What's the egg? > - What's the key to moving forward from here? > - Where should we be concentrating our (precious and few) resources? > - Will any of the new charter items be on this list? I think that such a discussion would be very useful in getting the word out about NETCONF and helping people understand how it could be used. There has, for example, been some discussion in the dnsop WG about developing a protocol for configuring and controlling nameservers (http://tools.ietf.org/wg/dnsop/minutes?item=minutes69.html ) and I am one of the authors of a draft (http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-arends-nscp-00.txt ) that suggests using NETCONF. The biggest issue for me in choosing NETCONF was and is to be sure I am using NETCONF appropriately and that it really is the correct solution to my problem. I am currently looking at such things as, what would be an appropriate data model, how to correctly use capabilities and how to engineer things that are not strictly configuration, such as control commands, monitoring and statistics gathering. Thanks, John --- John Dickinson jad@jadickinson.co.uk _______________________________________________ NGO mailing list NGO@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo
- [NGO] DRAFT agenda for NETCONF meeting at IETF 70… Simon Leinen
- [NGO] NETCONF-related sessions at IETF 70 Simon Leinen
- RE: [NGO] NETCONF-related sessions at IETF 70 Sharon Chisholm
- Re: [NGO] NETCONF-related sessions at IETF 70 Phil Shafer
- RE: [NGO] DRAFT agenda for NETCONF meeting at IET… Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- RE: [NGO] NETCONF-related sessions at IETF 70 Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [NGO] NETCONF-related sessions at IETF 70 Bharadwaj Kalahasti
- Re: [NGO] NETCONF-related sessions at IETF 70 Phil Shafer
- Re: [NGO] NETCONF-related sessions at IETF 70 John Dickinson
- Re: [NGO] NETCONF-related sessions at IETF 70 Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [NGO] NETCONF-related sessions at IETF 70 Bharadwaj Kalahasti
- Re: [NGO] NETCONF-related sessions at IETF 70 Simon Leinen
- Re: [NGO] NETCONF-related sessions at IETF 70 Balazs Lengyel