RE: [NGO] NETCONF-related sessions at IETF 70

Some of these questions may be appropriate (also) for the OPS Area open
meeting. 

Dan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Shafer [mailto:phil@juniper.net] 
> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2007 7:22 AM
> To: Sharon Chisholm
> Cc: ngo@ietf.org; netconf@ops.ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [NGO] NETCONF-related sessions at IETF 70 
> 
> "Sharon Chisholm" writes:
> >Either that or for more detailed discussion of the items in 
> the updated 
> >NETCONF charter.
> 
> Another thought is to come up with a list of the five biggest 
> impediments to NETCONF's complete domination of the 
> configuration space.  Do we know the answers to questions like:
> 
> - Why aren't/won't device folks shipping netconf implementations?
> - Why aren't/won't application writers moving to NETCONF?
> - Why isn't NETCONF becoming the answer to configuration problems?
> - What's stopping it?
> - Where's the chicken?
> - What's the egg?
> - What's the key to moving forward from here?
> - Where should we be concentrating our (precious and few) resources?
> - Will any of the new charter items be on this list?
> 
> Thanks,
>  Phil
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NGO mailing list
> NGO@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo
> 

_______________________________________________
NGO mailing list
NGO@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo