Re: [nmrg] network digital twin vs. digital twin network

Pedro Martinez-Julia <pedro@nict.go.jp> Thu, 09 March 2023 04:53 UTC

Return-Path: <pedro@nict.go.jp>
X-Original-To: nmrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nmrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0722FC14F75F for <nmrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Mar 2023 20:53:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nict.go.jp
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YwtKOm3Kgjka for <nmrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Mar 2023 20:53:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mo-csw.securemx.jp (mo-csw1115.securemx.jp [210.130.202.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05AF2C14F74A for <nmrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 8 Mar 2023 20:53:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nict.go.jp; h=Date:From:To: Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:In-Reply-To;i= pedro@nict.go.jp; s=key1.smx; t=1678337593; x=1679547193; bh=H90xsRTAJ2OcTyBn5VWM UcNBWvjcYXF7iso/h7Rn5ls=; b=bqXIDd7wViYwxoIuBfC0nQljlAtwieiFE/w+1SI/kg9Ng8ltVW 9cnlWHoWoGWfPn9UNoZB7R+Zn6IPvm1BGXzxkBX+tzj+mGAPPu0aD9O63p5tVEfSPmZyfm2b1Z2Xn 1QKNrNlMnx/J2tC+hp/HOHoE/Ww2bykF1paaZxi8iuWGHYup0nIIHJv2CBMfmPZy+yyCB8m2C7i4N 6wziGpoQHFiAGyduXZTqNf8wuFaIti3ILeUaDyJ8GzQe6GH9A4BiS7bYLI6Iv0UqY9ORsG+v4DqSW xRa8EhXPq+dsvbyd0dmEpMwnOXf5uMXySPDz6nQ1Yl6qIeK6fjHtQcsw8J4CA==;
Received: by mo-csw.securemx.jp (mx-mo-csw1115) id 3294rCG3011996; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 13:53:12 +0900
X-Iguazu-Qid: 2wHHJG9eLy8wKrYtG7
X-Iguazu-QSIG: v=2; s=0; t=1678337591; q=2wHHJG9eLy8wKrYtG7; m=+0ArxUXmrhtjuRwxGtBoiSIuxwS1RRn+1j+klstQM9w=
Received: from mail2.nict.go.jp (mail2.nict.go.jp [133.243.18.15]) by relay.securemx.jp (mx-mr1113) id 3294r6Gq038541 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 9 Mar 2023 13:53:06 +0900
Received: from spectre (ssh1.nict.go.jp [133.243.3.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.nict.go.jp (NICT Mail Spool Server2) with ESMTPSA id 0B77D1A43B2; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 13:53:06 +0900 (JST)
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2023 13:52:27 +0900
From: Pedro Martinez-Julia <pedro@nict.go.jp>
To: Cheng Zhou <zhouchengyjy@chinamobile.com>
Cc: 'Qin Wu' <bill.wu=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, 'Alexander Clemm' <alex@futurewei.com>, 'Christopher Janz' <christopher.janz@huawei.com>, 'Christopher Janz' <christopher.janz=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, 'Jürgen Schönwälder' <jschoenwaelder@constructor.university>, nmrg@irtf.org
Message-ID: <ZAlmC8lmQgehuUNO@spectre>
References: <6742261d8fd1443a9940b5780c0fb099@huawei.com> <03e701d95241$581b3430$08519c90$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <03e701d95241$581b3430$08519c90$@com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nmrg/FLpJzCIB3Z3XgX_JaRcnQF5W4BY>
Subject: Re: [nmrg] network digital twin vs. digital twin network
X-BeenThere: nmrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Management Research Group discussion list <nmrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/nmrg>, <mailto:nmrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nmrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:nmrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nmrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmrg>, <mailto:nmrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2023 04:53:48 -0000

On Thu, Mar 09, 2023 at 12:40:57PM +0800, Cheng Zhou wrote:
> No intention to bring more confusions here.
>
> - Digital twin network (DTN) in the draft means 'digital twin for
> network', which can mean more than just building a twinning entity of
> network. And from perspective of introducing Digital Twin in the
> network field, DTN can be the whole interactive virtual-real mapping
> system, building with the DT concept or techniques.
>
> - Network digital twin (NDT) means ' network's digital twin', the
> twinning entity of the physical entity, focusing on all
> functionalities in twin layer, including data, models, emulation, etc.
>
> This way, DTN and NDT is possible to co-exist in the draft with few
> confusion.
>
> Surely, if this is acceptable, current draft needs update via
> clarifying both terms.

The coexistence of two concepts whose names and meanings are so close
will end in more confusion. In fact, while your definition of NDT is
quite clear, your definition of DTN is not.

The virtual-real mapping you mention is a process required to build and
maintain a NDT. It must not be separated. Let's say that the goal, NDT,
is maintained by process "NDT construction" and this process is part of
what is called DTN. This is confusing.

> Thanks and Regards,
> Cheng

Regards,
Pedro

-- 
Pedro Martinez-Julia
Network Architecture Laboratory, Network Research Institute
National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT)
4-2-1, Nukui-Kitamachi, Koganei, Tokyo 184-8795, Japan
Email: pedro@nict.go.jp
---------------------------------------------------------
*** Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem ***