Re: [nmrg] IETF BOF proposal on autonomic networking use cases (better link)

"Michael Behringer (mbehring)" <mbehring@cisco.com> Fri, 06 June 2014 15:24 UTC

Return-Path: <mbehring@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: nmrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nmrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863D51A01C3 for <nmrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 08:24:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.152
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RMLVhmVIi6ZO for <nmrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 08:24:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 742291A0152 for <nmrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 08:24:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5892; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1402068259; x=1403277859; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=F8Ied2ECN4iiN8m4N+YLr54EWg5Ak8/OA6qbP1GTK9M=; b=a4kkqfhzM1F4CNvyNtRicipL+1+zPUlM05nNY6Fs0VUMD1ok62MLyeM7 51KJkugekmFo7iXZ4+AGJL5dLqTZidrHudOKjdHUngbKP/+gON85KbeNM rG/gyOwyp+Pd5AfuJdM4N6/p7MH0w9vrRifEaCM7CIvIbeg+ADoDaJE+D E=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuYLAJrckVOtJV2b/2dsb2JhbABZFoJ3UlYDgmyoAgUBkU+HPAEZbRZ1hAMBAQEEAQEBIBE6CwwEAgEIEQQBAQECAgYdAwICAh8GCxQBCAgCBAENBQgTiBMDEQ2tbZkgDYYIF4EqhDODYYMJgT8MJhYbBwaCbzaBFgSVRoJWgzuHAoUGA4V0gzxsgQJB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.98,989,1392163200"; d="scan'208";a="331148703"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Jun 2014 15:24:17 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com [173.37.183.84]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s56FOHaM000737 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 6 Jun 2014 15:24:17 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.39]) by xhc-rcd-x10.cisco.com ([173.37.183.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 10:24:17 -0500
From: "Michael Behringer (mbehring)" <mbehring@cisco.com>
To: "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [nmrg] IETF BOF proposal on autonomic networking use cases (better link)
Thread-Index: AQHPb9DXbhGG9y0xnkywojSDQ4ibp5tBIwKAgAA6H2CAAQkfgIAh7DcAgAAEKPA=
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 15:24:16 +0000
Message-ID: <3AA7118E69D7CD4BA3ECD5716BAF28DF21B9B4E2@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com>
References: <53727BA7.7040307@gmail.com> <CABv6xLtts__6uY8XSFYFZmnjxd_mFT0FkZOB7+V=jao1JYxYqg@mail.gmail.com> <53740EE7.8060504@gmail.com> <3AA7118E69D7CD4BA3ECD5716BAF28DF210A0975@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> <53751E0F.20902@gmail.com> <539192E8.7020905@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <539192E8.7020905@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.55.238.133]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nmrg/XxpaplkWob6uKMC9OvrPcXwuBvc
Cc: "nmrg@irtf.org" <nmrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [nmrg] IETF BOF proposal on autonomic networking use cases (better link)
X-BeenThere: nmrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Management Research Group discussion list <nmrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/nmrg>, <mailto:nmrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/nmrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:nmrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nmrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmrg>, <mailto:nmrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 15:24:40 -0000

Benoit, 

We will have another version out of the definitions draft before the IETF. You are right, this is the cornerstone of the work and needs to be updated with recent discussions and thoughts. This will also be on the agenda for the NMRG. 

Michael

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benoit Claise (bclaise)
> Sent: 06 June 2014 12:08
> To: Brian E Carpenter; Michael Behringer (mbehring)
> Cc: nmrg@irtf.org
> Subject: Re: [nmrg] IETF BOF proposal on autonomic networking use cases
> (better link)
> 
> On 15/05/2014 22:05, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> > On 15/05/2014 23:25, Michael Behringer (mbehring) wrote:
> >> Brian, Jefferson,
> >>
> >> I really think we should get as many use cases as possible. The more we
> have, the easier it will be to see patterns in communication, policy and
> other requirements.
> > I completely agree. If you look at the RTCweb use cases draft, it
> > contains 15 distinct use cases, from which they extracted 36 separate
> > requirements. If we have too many use cases to fit into one BOF, that
> > would be an excellent result!
> One of the issues with many use cases is: where do you draw the line
> between what is an AN use cases and what is not?
> There is so many features that have an AN aspect.
> Should all AN use cases follow the design goals in
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-nmrg-autonomic-network-definitions-
> 00?
> If yes, then you guys should really spend some time finishing up this work.
> This draft has not been updated for 6 months.
> 
> Regards, Benoit
> 
> >
> >     Brian
> >
> >> Potential use case authors: Make sure you highlight why distribution of
> intelligence is preferred over a centralised solution. We will have to answer
> many questions on "why not just centralise this functionality?", "Why do we
> need this functionality?". So it is important to bring out the advantages of
> an autonomic approach.
> >>
> >> Who else is thinking of contributing a use case?
> >>
> >> Michael
> >>
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: nmrg [mailto:nmrg-bounces@irtf.org] On Behalf Of Brian E
> >>> Carpenter
> >>> Sent: 15 May 2014 02:49
> >>> To: Jéferson Campos Nobre
> >>> Cc: nmrg@irtf.org
> >>> Subject: Re: [nmrg] IETF BOF proposal on autonomic networking use
> >>> cases (better link)
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Well, firstly, the BOF is not approved yet and we will not get a
> >>> decision until about June 13.
> >>>
> >>> But of course it would be great to have more use cases published.
> >>> At the moment we've timed the proposed agenda for a total of 4
> >>> cases, and if we get too many we may have to limit the time.
> >>>
> >>> Personally I think that a measurement use case would be very
> >>> interesting, because it's a bit different from traditional network
> management actions.
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>>     Brian
> >>>
> >>> On 15/05/2014 12:01, Jéferson Campos Nobre wrote:
> >>>> Hi Brian.
> >>>> Is it still possible to add use cases for presentation at the BOF?
> >>>> Lisandro and I are working in an draft about autonomic control of
> >>>> measurement probes which is based on the material presented at the
> >>>> 31st and 32nd NMRG meetings. The draft should be finished in a
> >>>> couple of weeks.
> >>>> Thank you.
> >>>> Best.
> >>>>
> >>>> Jéferson Campos Nobre
> >>>> PhD Student
> >>>> Computer Networks Group -  Institute of Informatics Federal
> >>>> University of Rio Grande do Sul http://www.inf.ufrgs.br/~jcnobre
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Brian E Carpenter
> >>>> <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki/WikiStart#UCANproposal
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Discussion here, and further use case documents, both very welcome.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>     Brian
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> nmrg mailing list
> >>>>> nmrg@irtf.org
> >>>>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmrg
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> nmrg mailing list
> >>> nmrg@irtf.org
> >>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmrg
> > _______________________________________________
> > nmrg mailing list
> > nmrg@irtf.org
> > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmrg