Re: [nmrg] Comments welcome on revised NMRG charter

Vishnu Ram OV <vishnu.n@ieee.org> Thu, 05 December 2019 07:24 UTC

Return-Path: <vishnu.n@ieee.org>
X-Original-To: nmrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nmrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2651200F5 for <nmrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 23:24:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URI_TRY_3LD=0.689] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ieee.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ObjdF5XdNlAP for <nmrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 23:23:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi1-x234.google.com (mail-oi1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 552CE1200E7 for <nmrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 23:23:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi1-x234.google.com with SMTP id a67so1838801oib.6 for <nmrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 23:23:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ieee.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=06P/BvwyIEN5zHLOyVUCf7bTu3D1hu391ZTFEaPDKV0=; b=UMF8pnIABQQWPhozGas4/mOXdqKMs+aILFkc4BNhy1WTZbD589oxUaSlbcP1egBx5/ cNxedoxsKR9gxqEdz6zEsBaqqmQE78Ciinp1+yDADu90yfrv9eQgCNA9+vBAPugQjePK FvgBKwF73Sb3N5pO7Yimv1ao7aPcBuX3CIe+U=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=06P/BvwyIEN5zHLOyVUCf7bTu3D1hu391ZTFEaPDKV0=; b=n1EiV12cSqm/5y/5NnAna1fQuFOdCIkcQ/k4G+Kq28b4DPoDu3lSpSD78SqLVzBOBA Uj8pjlMElIKbBEW+RXZB8aa2bbYuRLg3oB7T7gIbwLrwpg1EpWuqxhqus1/TBBlQ6d82 gBoXcJKK60tRpCVTB7OIdC4rPrZVFZmDbgfMWR+e0AK4h4D9ftSk7IxH3pIpkyXsNN3q YmFKY3UHM7cBlh/9R4L1TN3USEPZyMPpSi90tZpJnlU8gVEjZCwJwL1b1guI6uXqqSfI B0zEwZPdY61mMbV1MnziXaePHBVq7rphORBV4OThJaUfWQqyNk9syUz2g5N/bw8V4FMp SlWA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWEULNbgpu2EFtdZ/o6C0J+mGIS+MU9tM/KQRRR4rFOYWWmpVjb Pfl+mKEUMQ0BmQzRfzRNeY/HyyzLjdnJCOohSJlrKw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxyVR8NGXRkmRmvkRolUvol29ynfR0a+I8rNxwopg7BuZWXlxboJg+0Hn4JBebOE0AjGVhySKJSYsg+AEsDmN0=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:72cd:: with SMTP id p196mr5634741oic.99.1575530637356; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 23:23:57 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <PR1PR07MB4891347E917384D7042F58CCF34F0@PR1PR07MB4891.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <PR1PR07MB4891985BBF4D945841881F14F34F0@PR1PR07MB4891.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <BY5PR13MB33005C1563199A914C37D97ADB5D0@BY5PR13MB3300.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <PR1PR07MB4891B59A5BC455CA7A9408F3F35D0@PR1PR07MB4891.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <PR1PR07MB4891B59A5BC455CA7A9408F3F35D0@PR1PR07MB4891.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: Vishnu Ram OV <vishnu.n@ieee.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 12:53:31 +0530
Message-ID: <CAC7wRiu43pn_-hJTsWMPgAmPvBbfi8MgyBM2ebk4KC7uAVj7VA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Ciavaglia, Laurent (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" <laurent.ciavaglia@nokia.com>
Cc: Alexander Clemm <alex@futurewei.com>, "nmrg@irtf.org" <nmrg@irtf.org>, "nmrg-chairs@irtf.org" <nmrg-chairs@irtf.org>, "irtf-chair (irtf-chair@irtf.org)" <irtf-chair@irtf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f90fd40598efcfab"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nmrg/tIyso0VNmFRzGkD63c4trDNr944>
Subject: Re: [nmrg] Comments welcome on revised NMRG charter
X-BeenThere: nmrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Management Research Group discussion list <nmrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/nmrg>, <mailto:nmrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nmrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:nmrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nmrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmrg>, <mailto:nmrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 07:24:01 -0000

Hello All,

Thanks for asking feedback. I support the charter.
I can also say (from my personal experience) that some of the work items
are quite interesting to ITU FG ML5G that I work with.

Comments -
if the group sees sufficient interest, we can add the AI challenge, that we
discussed separately, as one of the possible work items under network
artificial intelligence topics?

Thanks,
Vishnu
whatsapp: +91 9844178052
Skype: vishnubright_1
WeChat: Vishnu-Ram-OV
FB Messenger: Vishnu.Ram.OV
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Vishnu_Ov/projects
<https://join.skype.com/invite/MFYtZ9DwJKd8>


On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 4:23 AM Ciavaglia, Laurent (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
<laurent.ciavaglia@nokia.com> wrote:

> Thank you Alex for the feedback on the charter. We will incorporate your
> comments.
>
>
>
> As for the milestones:
>
> You are right, milestones have not been defined yet. This is not an
> omission, rather an open/pending point.
>
> To my knowledge it is neither a common nor established practice to define
> milestones for RG (HRPC has one). But the possibility exists.
>
> With milestones, we (NMRG chairs) wanted to express a general planning of
> the research activities, in particular for the IBN work plan.
>
> Tis was also part of an initial discussion with Colin (IRTF Chair). Given
> the items listed in the work plan and the pace at which the RG is
> progressing, we currently think it is "challenging" to define milestones in
> a meaningful way, and not a posteriori.
>
> This is a point we will discuss with Colin on the updates of the revised
> charter.
>
>
>
> Best regards, Laurent.
>
>
>
> *From:* Alexander Clemm <alex@futurewei.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 4, 2019 23:40
> *To:* Ciavaglia, Laurent (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) <
> laurent.ciavaglia@nokia.com>; nmrg@irtf.org
> *Cc:* nmrg-chairs@irtf.org; irtf-chair (irtf-chair@irtf.org) <
> irtf-chair@irtf.org>
> *Subject:* RE: Comments welcome on revised NMRG charter
>
>
>
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> I think the charter proposal looks fine overall.
>
>
>
> One nit re: “The initial focus of the NMRG will be on higher-layer
> management services that interface with the current Internet management
> framework.”  NMRG has a long tradition, so perhaps it is better to not
> call it “The initial focus”, but to state “The current focus”, or perhaps
> (not ideal) “the initial focus of the current NMRG cycle”.
>
>
>
> Likewise the statement “The NMRG will investigate in priority three
> related topics”.  This suggests that the listed topics are in priority
> order, which I don’t think is correct – they are simply all topics of
> priority.  Perhaps rephrase to “The NMRG will prioritize investigation of
> three related topics”, or similar?
>
>
>
> There is one typo: “One one hand” (should be “On one hand”).
>
>
>
> Some more minor comments FWIW (feel free to ignore):
>
> - Third bullet item under IBN “categorize the different forms of intents
> and define what constitutes a “well-formed” intent; describe how an intent
> can be expressed and what can be expressed using an intent with means such
> as information models, grammars, and languages.”  I think that arguably
> the categorization could be covered under terminology; perhaps this bullet
> should simply focus on the second aspect (how to express intent), which is
> a more open-ended problem to which several solutions may be put forward.
>
>
>
> Since no milestones are listed, is the Milestones section still needed?
> (I assume they will be defined as working group documents get adopted.)
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
> --- Alex
>
>
>
> *From:* nmrg <nmrg-bounces@irtf.org> *On Behalf Of *Ciavaglia, Laurent
> (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 20, 2019 1:17 AM
> *To:* Ciavaglia, Laurent (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) <
> laurent.ciavaglia@nokia.com>; nmrg@irtf.org
> *Cc:* nmrg-chairs@irtf.org; irtf-chair (irtf-chair@irtf.org) <
> irtf-chair@irtf.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [nmrg] Comments welcome on revised NMRG charter
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> In addition to the previous email, a few additional links for your
> convenience:
>
>    - Version -01 of NMRG charter:
>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/1e84-M4DEDi-LCXjLG0Wf0JhbPXVcIPm2hnFFIQPrkro/edit?usp=sharing
>    <https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2Fdocument%2Fd%2F1e84-M4DEDi-LCXjLG0Wf0JhbPXVcIPm2hnFFIQPrkro%2Fedit%3Fusp%3Dsharing&data=02%7C01%7Calex%40futurewei.com%7C33241176de274246eed408d76d9a78d1%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637098382547674184&sdata=e85hgUuBg71bWNaQUL5iNwVPWrSQYuMx%2B%2BW26KP8TVM%3D&reserved=0>
>    - Comparison between version -01 and -02:
>    https://docs.google.com/document/d/19xidbplhn5gPr41QdeXBTh2WLhoA9kbhNieZiSh0Uyk/edit?usp=sharing
>    <https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2Fdocument%2Fd%2F19xidbplhn5gPr41QdeXBTh2WLhoA9kbhNieZiSh0Uyk%2Fedit%3Fusp%3Dsharing&data=02%7C01%7Calex%40futurewei.com%7C33241176de274246eed408d76d9a78d1%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637098382547684192&sdata=U%2BZkwEydIcU26n7GNnMQfwcCMnbr40058ChrQEXPQXs%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
> Also, to clarify:
>
>    - The intent of the charter revision is not a complete overhaul but
>    more to capture more recent activities the RG has engaged into and reflect
>    that in an update of the original charter together with a work plan.
>
> You can see in the comparison, that the first part (original charter) has
> not been changed.
>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
> Best regards, Laurent.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Ciavaglia, Laurent (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) <
> laurent.ciavaglia@nokia.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 20, 2019 06:46
> *To:* nmrg@irtf.org
> *Cc:* nmrg-chairs@irtf.org
> *Subject:* Comments welcome on revised NMRG charter
>
>
>
> Hi NMRG,
>
>
>
> Jérôme and I have been working on a new version of the NMRG charter to
> capture better the current shape and activity of the RG.
>
>
>
> We'd like to receive comments from the community. This is on the agenda of
> the session on Friday.
>
>
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/14eHQALG95VHE5N-YIAwH6vriKFG2WvI8d63TtugZLgU/edit?usp=sharing
> <https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2Fdocument%2Fd%2F14eHQALG95VHE5N-YIAwH6vriKFG2WvI8d63TtugZLgU%2Fedit%3Fusp%3Dsharing&data=02%7C01%7Calex%40futurewei.com%7C33241176de274246eed408d76d9a78d1%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637098382547694199&sdata=LfR1fw5Q4IshxAbHRn%2F5M5AZXge6kzsL%2BFlLpbI7%2F%2B8%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
> Thank you.
>
> Best regards, Jérôme & Laurent.
> _______________________________________________
> nmrg mailing list
> nmrg@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmrg
>