Re: [nmrg] Comments welcome on revised NMRG charter

Alexander Clemm <alex@futurewei.com> Wed, 04 December 2019 22:39 UTC

Return-Path: <alex@futurewei.com>
X-Original-To: nmrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nmrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56AA7120048; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 14:39:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=futurewei.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hpHXr3-iyYNN; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 14:39:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from NAM12-MW2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-mw2nam12on2120.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.244.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6B3312002F; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 14:39:34 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=kKhNK/WSkohSWn6I8xTwTHmiB/XYM1EjZFn9SwLKx74cL1M4D1fpbwAg6q3mzNTozI6OZTaaKGStgIL+n8bGociZS40H7Y75WkTINgzHZlciA82b621vy/k3j2+Xjfb789pOaLgtY+GQxRoj6Vvr7gZRRriw8Fyu4XxF/JBLC2X9O30N0K7wsoWbui22S+A0kGmAjP33Nj8c/5Ou0VTyVCkZD0W02r6X9SSAnQxaHv+8Ix8aszxZDYkUAuNsRr8VFDr2Y2Zw97hvOr2iC20ubVN9j9pIcHsU0XROMJ5eSte3Jh/w6PxPvgSkrcYsRAYaEMCuu0kU+nIs0wB+Qpamww==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=TA5/pi/WD1HW+smDd+bUhyxelf0sA5xRPpg27yyHDFk=; b=IyysgFuTEw/pauPJL6CFQENo2588mxHsDmgP3RV4XaVG/jT3lLm/vW0oAZ5egAi5JZeH9tpppL/XE/L1jSjv4wx1A4dHxMQb3o4Bkv8M+Tka722FC4rdfYKCbQ8pz18RvlBac499YoJk/wWHXnnnjIVo4ktfyX8nVwIhgg+5h9LOi5OJB8qX2ZX/Ciw+pRP0D8Fv/PEo2o1qEJ284y26vhuF6Uz+qPJlLnRm/j/lgiCzOLQgTYNY4E6eNMeoC7mnDr0pI/PZbGNCOdLwvt11PeGyDuPbr1ofYYjjNZ0VDP1rwcmkwAnPZug5i2iq4ewct71A8Z/AdDC0NV7fUXS9WQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=futurewei.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=futurewei.com; dkim=pass header.d=futurewei.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Futurewei.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=TA5/pi/WD1HW+smDd+bUhyxelf0sA5xRPpg27yyHDFk=; b=KP4SUnzrZjv9tFhyuZq7nM6ao1eEahzj5xkpmpALab83E4mKwW9rQ5tCW7Zb+wBrJ8tyGY+V+x1vXcrh1WU2tFWCVnzkMK/mn2KYaOwJOliFnAULzlbsu7Jp5BXo0HlK84jj/1Ko2wlvfvI2+5euGfT625tvGU5oQFy0x6LlCwM=
Received: from BY5PR13MB3300.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (10.255.138.213) by BY5PR13MB3299.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (10.255.136.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2538.6; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 22:39:33 +0000
Received: from BY5PR13MB3300.namprd13.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a176:12d8:f4ba:ad17]) by BY5PR13MB3300.namprd13.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::a176:12d8:f4ba:ad17%5]) with mapi id 15.20.2538.005; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 22:39:33 +0000
From: Alexander Clemm <alex@futurewei.com>
To: "Ciavaglia, Laurent (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)" <laurent.ciavaglia@nokia.com>, "nmrg@irtf.org" <nmrg@irtf.org>
CC: "nmrg-chairs@irtf.org" <nmrg-chairs@irtf.org>, "irtf-chair (irtf-chair@irtf.org)" <irtf-chair@irtf.org>
Thread-Topic: Comments welcome on revised NMRG charter
Thread-Index: AdWfZcVcQa9XbhqFQGi/B5MCTfQZqQAHH3YgAtjulUA=
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2019 22:39:32 +0000
Message-ID: <BY5PR13MB33005C1563199A914C37D97ADB5D0@BY5PR13MB3300.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
References: <PR1PR07MB4891347E917384D7042F58CCF34F0@PR1PR07MB4891.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <PR1PR07MB4891985BBF4D945841881F14F34F0@PR1PR07MB4891.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <PR1PR07MB4891985BBF4D945841881F14F34F0@PR1PR07MB4891.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=alex@futurewei.com;
x-originating-ip: [12.111.81.95]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 24f8ebee-5a95-4e66-5188-08d7790ad53d
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BY5PR13MB3299:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY5PR13MB329926903E80DBE751868E1CDB5D0@BY5PR13MB3299.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8882;
x-forefront-prvs: 0241D5F98C
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(4636009)(376002)(366004)(136003)(346002)(396003)(39850400004)(51444003)(53754006)(199004)(189003)(296002)(316002)(410100003)(33656002)(8676002)(966005)(2501003)(110136005)(2906002)(81166006)(14454004)(81156014)(54906003)(86362001)(66556008)(66446008)(64756008)(52536014)(76116006)(71200400001)(71190400001)(8936002)(66476007)(5660300002)(14444005)(561944003)(66946007)(6506007)(66574012)(26005)(4326008)(229853002)(102836004)(11346002)(6436002)(7696005)(74316002)(53546011)(478600001)(6246003)(54896002)(6306002)(99286004)(55016002)(7736002)(9686003)(25786009)(186003)(76176011)(790700001)(3846002)(6116002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY5PR13MB3299; H:BY5PR13MB3300.namprd13.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: futurewei.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BY5PR13MB33005C1563199A914C37D97ADB5D0BY5PR13MB3300namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: Futurewei.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 24f8ebee-5a95-4e66-5188-08d7790ad53d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 04 Dec 2019 22:39:32.9344 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 0fee8ff2-a3b2-4018-9c75-3a1d5591fedc
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: ZTXaaAj41Yltks9XLrNr6BYMWLjt9xt5Mr7WFL2gRf08xKk3cRI0HzAiptgAR2m59nBATJyaZok0t/B1kBbxtg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY5PR13MB3299
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nmrg/8ZtDdxFqnhkR6bZ1MtUsO9QgYsc>
Subject: Re: [nmrg] Comments welcome on revised NMRG charter
X-BeenThere: nmrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Management Research Group discussion list <nmrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/nmrg>, <mailto:nmrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nmrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:nmrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nmrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nmrg>, <mailto:nmrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2019 22:39:38 -0000

Hello all,

I think the charter proposal looks fine overall.

One nit re: "The initial focus of the NMRG will be on higher-layer management services that interface with the current Internet management framework."  NMRG has a long tradition, so perhaps it is better to not call it "The initial focus", but to state "The current focus", or perhaps (not ideal) "the initial focus of the current NMRG cycle".

Likewise the statement "The NMRG will investigate in priority three related topics".  This suggests that the listed topics are in priority order, which I don't think is correct - they are simply all topics of priority.  Perhaps rephrase to "The NMRG will prioritize investigation of three related topics", or similar?

There is one typo: "One one hand" (should be "On one hand").

Some more minor comments FWIW (feel free to ignore):

- Third bullet item under IBN "categorize the different forms of intents and define what constitutes a "well-formed" intent; describe how an intent can be expressed and what can be expressed using an intent with means such as information models, grammars, and languages."  I think that arguably the categorization could be covered under terminology; perhaps this bullet should simply focus on the second aspect (how to express intent), which is a more open-ended problem to which several solutions may be put forward.

Since no milestones are listed, is the Milestones section still needed?  (I assume they will be defined as working group documents get adopted.)

Cheers
--- Alex

From: nmrg <nmrg-bounces@irtf.org> On Behalf Of Ciavaglia, Laurent (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2019 1:17 AM
To: Ciavaglia, Laurent (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) <laurent.ciavaglia@nokia.com>; nmrg@irtf.org
Cc: nmrg-chairs@irtf.org; irtf-chair (irtf-chair@irtf.org) <irtf-chair@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [nmrg] Comments welcome on revised NMRG charter

Hello,

In addition to the previous email, a few additional links for your convenience:

  *   Version -01 of NMRG charter: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1e84-M4DEDi-LCXjLG0Wf0JhbPXVcIPm2hnFFIQPrkro/edit?usp=sharing<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2Fdocument%2Fd%2F1e84-M4DEDi-LCXjLG0Wf0JhbPXVcIPm2hnFFIQPrkro%2Fedit%3Fusp%3Dsharing&data=02%7C01%7Calex%40futurewei.com%7C33241176de274246eed408d76d9a78d1%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637098382547674184&sdata=e85hgUuBg71bWNaQUL5iNwVPWrSQYuMx%2B%2BW26KP8TVM%3D&reserved=0>
  *   Comparison between version -01 and -02: https://docs.google.com/document/d/19xidbplhn5gPr41QdeXBTh2WLhoA9kbhNieZiSh0Uyk/edit?usp=sharing<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2Fdocument%2Fd%2F19xidbplhn5gPr41QdeXBTh2WLhoA9kbhNieZiSh0Uyk%2Fedit%3Fusp%3Dsharing&data=02%7C01%7Calex%40futurewei.com%7C33241176de274246eed408d76d9a78d1%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637098382547684192&sdata=U%2BZkwEydIcU26n7GNnMQfwcCMnbr40058ChrQEXPQXs%3D&reserved=0>

Also, to clarify:

  *   The intent of the charter revision is not a complete overhaul but more to capture more recent activities the RG has engaged into and reflect that in an update of the original charter together with a work plan.
You can see in the comparison, that the first part (original charter) has not been changed.

Thank you.
Best regards, Laurent.


From: Ciavaglia, Laurent (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) <laurent.ciavaglia@nokia.com<mailto:laurent.ciavaglia@nokia.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2019 06:46
To: nmrg@irtf.org<mailto:nmrg@irtf.org>
Cc: nmrg-chairs@irtf.org<mailto:nmrg-chairs@irtf.org>
Subject: Comments welcome on revised NMRG charter

Hi NMRG,

Jérôme and I have been working on a new version of the NMRG charter to capture better the current shape and activity of the RG.

We'd like to receive comments from the community. This is on the agenda of the session on Friday.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/14eHQALG95VHE5N-YIAwH6vriKFG2WvI8d63TtugZLgU/edit?usp=sharing<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.google.com%2Fdocument%2Fd%2F14eHQALG95VHE5N-YIAwH6vriKFG2WvI8d63TtugZLgU%2Fedit%3Fusp%3Dsharing&data=02%7C01%7Calex%40futurewei.com%7C33241176de274246eed408d76d9a78d1%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637098382547694199&sdata=LfR1fw5Q4IshxAbHRn%2F5M5AZXge6kzsL%2BFlLpbI7%2F%2B8%3D&reserved=0>

Thank you.
Best regards, Jérôme & Laurent.