IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Nsaas] 答复: Existing work, other things

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Tue, 12 August 2014 17:22 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nsaas@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nsaas@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5EFF1A03FE for <nsaas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SFZvp3wNV0hT for <nsaas@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:22:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22e.google.com (mail-pa0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE58C1A03E6 for <nsaas@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:22:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id lj1so13263610pab.19 for <nsaas@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:22:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1s0F+X2EHJsV0AvU52lZ7qxNx2bXEI8J1DKXlXPz3+I=; b=wVJ9bcCcI9f/UtUgb0aD8LENDLXEnrzKTjJqcZo3Btx00+Lc2ImuFC7GI7RbtozDEU 2CU+yebatZ9w9rtsyDgiY8UjNvtnybsuujN/7EPwdHTkx560jNhYde4nNxGKbBujV4ze zwjouVLRAKC6lK6Nx7hs+pJT3Fov/iU6O2YQLNs5IDCcPZo37/CQRmFR8hqmCcVJllRn JTEKiZc03k1fp8p+06//an7HCFKqqhVA6/2z0nRmHVjMsRaVid79hjtvd2AgCpaV48xm UBKuKxOzW6KtAWE+MPKNIClwgE3rK9Wj8JFeOW9yM9w5hv3ZPmOd0hQuw775rmyrxk7x zlyA==
X-Received: by 10.66.66.202 with SMTP id h10mr5557028pat.70.1407864161609; Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:22:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spandex.local (216-67-123-104.dynamic.cdma.acsalaska.net. [216.67.123.104]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id i3sm12178919pdp.2.2014.08.12.10.22.40 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Aug 2014 10:22:40 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53EA4D5E.70303@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 09:22:38 -0800
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@huawei.com>, "nsaas@ietf.org" <nsaas@ietf.org>
References: <53E97DB5.3040106@gmail.com> <B0D29E0424F2DE47A0B36779EC666779661978DE@nkgeml501-mbs.china.huawei.com> <53E98377.1030902@gmail.com> <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F645DB236D@dfweml701-chm.china.huawei.com> <53EA3EBE.50200@gmail.com> <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F645DB2420@dfweml701-chm.china.huawei.com> <53EA4704.2090401@gmail.com> <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F645DB2460@dfweml701-chm.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A95BA014132FF49AE685FAB4B9F17F645DB2460@dfweml701-chm.china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nsaas/0N46pWSpZIxX7SR18IG2ErpcmiU
Subject: Re: [Nsaas] 答复: Existing work, other things
X-BeenThere: nsaas@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "*NSaaS: Network Security as a Service mailing list*" <nsaas.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nsaas>, <mailto:nsaas-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nsaas/>
List-Post: <mailto:nsaas@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nsaas-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsaas>, <mailto:nsaas-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2014 17:22:44 -0000

On 8/12/14 9:08 AM, Linda Dunbar wrote:
> Thank you for the listing. There is also SACM. 
> I will include those IETF initiatives in the existing work of IETF. Gap analysis will be needed. 

I think a gap analysis is premature, given the lack of a sense
of overall direction.  And my question really is *not* about
why these protocols may not be applicable.  My question is why
you feel that new work would be successful given the lack of
implementation and deployment of previous efforts (and also
given that OpenStack has an implementation of their own design).
We pretty clearly do not want to sink time and effort into yet
another unimplemented protocol.

Melinda

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email