RE: [NSIS] additional comment on draft-ietf-nsis-req-03.txt

"Hancock, Robert" <robert.hancock@roke.co.uk> Wed, 10 July 2002 23:17 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA23105 for <nsis-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 19:17:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id TAA16495 for nsis-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 19:18:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA16082; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 19:05:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA16025 for <nsis@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 19:05:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rsys000a.roke.co.uk (rsys000a.roke.co.uk [193.118.201.102]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id TAA22830 for <nsis@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2002 19:04:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by rsys002a.roke.co.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <3QXQDFSF>; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 00:04:36 +0100
Message-ID: <76C92FBBFB58D411AE760090271ED41805203D3A@rsys002a.roke.co.uk>
From: "Hancock, Robert" <robert.hancock@roke.co.uk>
To: brunner@ccrle.nec.de, "Georgios Karagiannis (ELN)" <Georgios.Karagiannis@eln.ericsson.se>, "'john.loughney@nokia.com'" <john.loughney@nokia.com>, nsis@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [NSIS] additional comment on draft-ietf-nsis-req-03.txt
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 00:04:27 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------InterScan_NT_MIME_Boundary"
Sender: nsis-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: nsis-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Next Steps in Signaling <nsis.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: nsis@ietf.org

hi,

i'm slightly baffled by this.

i was taking a wild guess that georgios was referring to nsis-triggering-nsis scenarios (e.g. 5.5 in draft-hancock-nsis-fw-00, also draft-westberg-nsis-edge-edge-framework-00). if that's the case, isn't it covered by 5.3.6? [actually, i'm not certain that this turns into a feature visible in the protocol, it could be just a way of using the protocol; but we'll discover that during the framework.]

if georgios is referring to transport/application layering as in draft-braden-2level-signal-arch-00.txt then isn't this covered by 5.1.4 (although we should probably refer to something more general than QoS...). i certainly don't like the term 'hierarchical' for this.

georgios, what is your concern?

robert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marcus Brunner [mailto:brunner@ccrle.nec.de]
> Sent: 10 July 2002 17:09
> To: Georgios Karagiannis (ELN); 'john.loughney@nokia.com'; 
> nsis@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [NSIS] additional comment on draft-ietf-nsis-req-03.txt
> 
> 
> John is right I aslo don't like multi-level XXX difficult to 
> understand. I 
> regard modularity as the right word in the title, but I will 
> go over the 
> text such that in really includes what Georgios means.
> 
> Marcus
> 
> --On Mittwoch, 10. Juli 2002 17:46 +0200 "Georgios Karagiannis (ELN)" 
> <Georgios.Karagiannis@eln.ericsson.se> wrote:
> 
> > Hi John
> >
> > What about muliu level signaling?
> >
> > best regards,
> > Georgios
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: john.loughney@nokia.com [mailto:john.loughney@nokia.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 5:45 PM
> > To: brunner@ccrle.nec.de; Georgios.Karagiannis@eln.ericsson.se;
> > nsis@ietf.org
> > Subject: RE: [NSIS] additional comment on draft-ietf-nsis-req-03.txt
> >
> >
> > Hi Marcus,
> >
> >> Ok, I agree I will do some polishing of this for -04
> >> Marcus
> >>
> >> --On Mittwoch, 10. Juli 2002 15:58 +0200 "Georgios 
> Karagiannis (ELN)"
> >> <Georgios.Karagiannis@eln.ericsson.se> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi Marcus
> >> >
> >> > The hierarchical levels are refering to protocol
> >> functionality levels.
> >> > A similar concept is presented in
> >> draft-braden-2level-signal-arch-00.txt
> >> > where two levels of protocol functionality are defined.
> >
> > I think this is OK, however I don't like the term 'hierarchical'
> > in this case.
> >
> > John
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > nsis mailing list
> > nsis@ietf.org
> > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis
> 
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Dr. Marcus Brunner
> Network Laboratories
> NEC Europe Ltd.
> 
> E-Mail: brunner@ccrle.nec.de
> WWW:    http://www.ccrle.nec.de/
> personal home page: http://www.brubers.org/marcus
========================================================================================
Permission is hereby granted to pass the contents of this communication to third parties and any restrictions regarding confidentiality do not apply.