IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] WGLC on draft-ietf-alternative-port-01

Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Thu, 24 June 2021 05:08 UTC

Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 407E73A4409 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 22:08:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jg45cyf7O4Bt for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 22:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x629.google.com (mail-ej1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::629]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F9E83A4408 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 22:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x629.google.com with SMTP id l1so7462862ejb.6 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 22:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=aKzAN0jN9wZ6X58HIk0l2E3x4DVJBhlMAdcBQf9YIBc=; b=MgdfJJy/JSUG2401y+UXqwHmRwrQbfg6xJ2/WEs5Hb+qY0Lt94ib55XbiwRyNagxl0 /JiZXEP9vlK22Sot8o89ystf/wMKZUEKO07JHfBCsm++M90MYIxriMowRBX9Y5UHubEs zVcr5E98qp3XAUlz7+cb61HIZuPf28DhlqhhsbGWhqx4XfHObX7J0fk1ygKyvSGo8Yyo Ez2N9slzJMNY1Cch3NJpiiI8edNCnFBOHfVl3bDy1KAHHjK61RZIURQkFexE0YdE+OM7 pF0DG6eEQiaFXcpAQlUc3blQSRgm2KP+gxs2emPSTvnjSuNCL9dnHhruVZ74BmEBMi9F eObw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aKzAN0jN9wZ6X58HIk0l2E3x4DVJBhlMAdcBQf9YIBc=; b=FNU3xvQJrYyELF9TMZe1nn8bhWf3DdYiuqfI80zFYxjmC2KoBpGqRhdEeZQicQAYPT zb2kbMB+64coW8BnCxRIFZzkEK3bWys6lUe2E6qUQhdOwXAS/LK/D4tDmJZr+Us9laC6 MwJRMydhqyKFpQq7J8clxp8yFVl4/E8V8SxnSovWUiS7rYNxdQmdwi6Nl71Y0a5ZhMsh XWhTqqH27uM23gPqdw2tySbYs4MkcmVKLu2jrpuqmAMvlnAleImuFBSKLV7YcjGoemOo bmU8aYUeZGR5RxIxKnH9gav3tU+GDOhbbzjby+ysUWXhxm+FNjOjy61BjySfnCI8d0V3 yFCA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533mpdNkV9Mr5uJOgCAaLHVs7T+dW4wR0OCb2kW0WCYmFxq2haYY QMqpjS+oJimBZMCHfrHUxZUIUrZjauH6O+3MQbOn+5KqjZY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyLrjIXp3pCaERZRXkJTVre8iPLdCCxcHk9R3OHUGX4CCmr6HkFd63hMHo5nZ2zL9gfdW9BG8ZD4ytN+HbiQvY=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:8a72:: with SMTP id hy18mr3307166ejc.393.1624511315884; Wed, 23 Jun 2021 22:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <PH0PR06MB7061EF8C35B67CDE520E60F2C2349@PH0PR06MB7061.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <YNMbMd+3dDjAnIDP@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <YNMbMd+3dDjAnIDP@localhost>
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 22:08:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CACsn0cnMR=E13wd06+=Jdr++s5hqvSt7VitE8euUzc2dF_SjtQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
Cc: NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/2dvtDbat9JUMPvNH71pk1AcBSYw>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] WGLC on draft-ietf-alternative-port-01
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 05:08:43 -0000

On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 4:30 AM Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 01:36:03PM +0000, Karen O'Donoghue wrote:
> > NTP Working Group,
> >
> > This email starts a two week working group last call (WGLC) on
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ntp-alternative-port/
>
> One thing that I'd like to specifically ask everyone to consider
> is the intended future of the alternative port. Do we expect NTP to
> fully move there at some point and keep the port 123 only for legacy
> implementations? Or should it always be just an alternative in case
> the port 123 is not working?

I do not think the situation with port 123 is salvageable. There is
too much blocking and other manipulation. I think this doc as is is
the only way forward.


--
Astra mortemque praestare gradatim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email