Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: WGLC on draft‑ietf‑alternative‑port‑01

Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Thu, 29 July 2021 15:02 UTC

Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4388E3A259C for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 08:02:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FxL1MR8RsiKu for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 08:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x533.google.com (mail-ed1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::533]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 645C53A2592 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 08:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x533.google.com with SMTP id d6so1010291edt.7 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 08:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kH07sOLt00ANdzPS9Vi+BHGW8Fn7N8aOy25a296xoFA=; b=arhKpNpsAib+nqs7PDn/3VdSofjcWQnIRUy1LE2bXqFrgsjTgLZ26ldlFTB93r7s6W eO6bAVkY7MhGI5cqljBMOUafCwvNX5yZ61fdl4K1jKIRugmVUsEJjOZMZjJkz3ebQVwB IGLn1XTXwYXAhvXZhN1XWT7j1E5IpWMuw+zcSPL0MxtBFIXMNCLZS2SLf7D6DIH/L+pe fJJ0z0Rz4fCUVZd8DT8aHV632xbhzOhJbwjnMUN5qC2O/9zWF8YVq+tkOuhu0IID8DhE xOIKjWD4+CtFs8Y0ra8vAbVhagxchM0GuJzOz+LErmrs/dLbPsS47iNlZYt5MPGgqjjR qqGg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kH07sOLt00ANdzPS9Vi+BHGW8Fn7N8aOy25a296xoFA=; b=e9+tY09IxFCeFLtc9RYRNjsYv5FE2cnCD8L1fs42XGviZZm6zA4/oPeBKVg3Iut3U5 57e/eBKDd9+/kWHdxkTNaTuHrxgl9HDFNWnykx8sspLdCSU5xP+2I4lVhKKqKdXpFGUn xYevybc8PWjUvxkDgjnMueEVqR8tmkZHKp/HG1k6GT0pw5hDw+tmmENcQBlp+k8SfDvz 7uBBw8lxjozN2xEF1WzGt0EtlbLVzqn+gjmmzla3BwimXxmcmCMdvaxFdDHq15kADQVs ja2A2xorgKWVUsrEo3PELNTNn0hntgdY9iJLEQL2uL/8RwGdfCN3dz2vGgHMz0xjrPy9 nKNw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5304uobYHP2eGqwYNNA5krkPO8wo8S93RKFk9qai405bL0gXvunf bnX/1jejwO9f8X3vgN7CmnaT5mMCcoco2Obv+vc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyLXlEN1jxrbY60o5cwDX22JazM5UDESCFBIKa1w7H2QjyyBLyb7VZxDU2lIYkyCqCyepwdplfNulol6nsgeTo=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:9ae3:: with SMTP id p90mr6555862edb.154.1627570917367; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 08:01:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <PH0PR06MB7061EF8C35B67CDE520E60F2C2349@PH0PR06MB7061.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <YNMbMd+3dDjAnIDP@localhost> <CACsn0cnMR=E13wd06+=Jdr++s5hqvSt7VitE8euUzc2dF_SjtQ@mail.gmail.com> <a39454b6-31b2-a8f5-1070-3d1b3c155297@pdmconsulting.net> <492BFE65-30FD-42AC-8891-B9A7D007BC03@gmail.com> <ac4aa859-7d26-17ba-a33b-dec781258b52@pdmconsulting.net> <YP562akF+CL/9R5s@localhost> <CACsn0ckn+-MTrnd7KLVQCjyGnDPAPhPYYZm6W-w92vtd0PEAgQ@mail.gmail.com> <610253DA020000A100042C8B@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de> <61025C79020000A100042C9B@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de>
In-Reply-To: <61025C79020000A100042C9B@gwsmtp.uni-regensburg.de>
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 08:01:45 -0700
Message-ID: <CACsn0c=2iV01P+gNLXU-NcmsCyUcsO1QAgKfyQcUg8Ci4R+3Dg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
Cc: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>, Dieter Sibold <dsibold.ietf@gmail.com>, NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>, Danny Mayer <mayer@pdmconsulting.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/ch_PM2pMWfn6yyWcGFE3P4AA7Ok>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Antw: [EXT] Re: WGLC on draft‑ietf‑alternative‑port‑01
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Time Protocol <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 15:02:16 -0000

On Thu, Jul 29, 2021, 12:45 AM Ulrich Windl
<Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> wrote:
<snip>
> >> We see issues at Cloudflare with packet delivery on port 123. ISP
> >> middleboxes are going to police by length, and an alternative port is
> >> the way forward. There is much less policing on the alternative ports.
> >
> > Actually I'd think teching cloudflare would be better than changing the
>
> I had meant to write "teaching"...

It's not our devices: it's middleboxes in ISP networks. We only find
out from customer pcaps where one in four NTS packets makes it
through. The policing is by length because that is what these boxes
support.

>
>
> > port.
> > Otherwise: When do we change the port again?

Don't screw up and put UDP amplifiers out, and the port will be fine.

> >
> >>
> >> Sincerely,
> >> Watson Ladd
> >>
> >>>
> >>> ‑‑
> >>> Miroslav Lichvar
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> ‑‑
> >> Astra mortemque praestare gradatim
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> ntp mailing list
> >> ntp@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ntp mailing list
> > ntp@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp
>
>
>