IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] comments on draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-23

Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> Thu, 26 March 2020 15:34 UTC

Return-Path: <sandy@tislabs.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8333A0D74; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 08:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.233
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.233 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7WU5T_6dm-yE; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 08:33:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from walnut.tislabs.com (walnut.tislabs.com [192.94.214.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF4DC3A0D2E; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 08:33:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nova.tislabs.com (unknown [10.66.1.77]) by walnut.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D372A28B003D; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 11:33:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by nova.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 242C71F804E; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 11:33:57 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <99D9C210-3F59-405E-8F74-E4DED592493F@tislabs.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 11:33:55 -0400
Cc: ntp@ietf.org, Ragnar Sundblad <ragge@netnod.se>, ntp-chairs@ietf.org, Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <49F99D81-EDA9-4ABA-9131-620CDE68311A@tislabs.com>
References: <F5D62F1F-6705-4DEE-8A24-C7DAEAC02AB0@tislabs.com> <43842926-38F3-4274-904B-AEBE8248E9A2@tislabs.com> <99D9C210-3F59-405E-8F74-E4DED592493F@tislabs.com>
To: Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/AufMrQMJeKEZdcaYTltW3vB7rGM>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] comments on draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-23
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 15:34:15 -0000

Gad.  I was so absorbed in constructing a detailed reply that I missed the fact that publication had been decided.

—Sandy

> On Mar 26, 2020, at 8:03 AM, Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> wrote:
> 
> My responses took the form of general comments in the message text and a bunch of detailed comments in an attachment.  I’m going to respond to whether they were were addressed in v26 in two messages.  One will cover the detailed comments, this time inline the message text (an attachment was a mistake).  The other will cover the general comments.
> 
> —Sandy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email