IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] comments on draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-23

Ragnar Sundblad <ragge@netnod.se> Thu, 26 March 2020 15:50 UTC

Return-Path: <ragge@netnod.se>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6549C3A0E00 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 08:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netnod-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vLF8SAFaZSyJ for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 08:50:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x134.google.com (mail-lf1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 801963A0C3F for <ntp@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 08:50:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x134.google.com with SMTP id v4so5228857lfo.12 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 08:50:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netnod-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=4kv9S/11HWFQEAQ9FRKZQO+KrhuaGv/6zAj+zBBSuYA=; b=DJdyYZ6VYXiUYaXnzujz5eeEztMdmqwlaB+DPwnbFhorhwMNo34bVmB56BwOloja0q YvgzL1DII4DZi+ZWuTDILRu/FrXq4fDnG8Bwq5zv/mGdleC6G+K6hLs2UxCMuHvI9kMN LOwWD4+Qsq5e8LnqIGszne1RQa+Hmig+0MJbamjQfVb7xAR+rRGXt0jfJFOzs37XvsaH Qh0Fkev8nU7mOaAd96SOPAEsO2YGA07bSONHEtB32b5gBmxwpET95tHqjDjM8FShcWI5 wsE3Kg1w1V3gzsxgjOc7iDxZSqNUztqkPr4RduHPqRBXRhK/uzU6e46eA1nEbY6MeScH R/CA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=4kv9S/11HWFQEAQ9FRKZQO+KrhuaGv/6zAj+zBBSuYA=; b=jIe59818bN7qB3QiSInk3TYnQaosVeyClkMXy3ARxxVSGJS6L0xwTpihUvH1GuI+JG /yQW2MFQj2wYGym+dvLkCxfdhS6fpbCK54VnY1zyc+lWwCkZubEw9elZ6xt0hooX8Uk0 vRusBWs+V5FKfZDB7R+uJ11oml7dOhHLH/yUat2wUjhJZFyYSskIsEvAe5ThqpnT1gW1 mbYAl9k4bah0jgiQvroI1b9scSny6TwhQAe97YmbtgAEQJKYodvYqNwiYJ8k1F1vdNYM FNuvjpm6823YLdy1hIKEXtNVefT/mek1pvhze3PYXmdTzXB4d8XMxP2n9TK7BXMMhXeS nVRA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYb2ykY9NA7jua4sAKWlHJmf2t09BK0Y7eNzn+CUJ+oF0DYnAAv WG8i9lUF2EfVHinKDo0JZtdB5w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLLnrofANL/oN+wKbR1hUzLsp0R1PFOjAJdk3YTTukUJPHqTxQ50v9VDj7NkJFyCNsnFojH8g==
X-Received: by 2002:a19:8c06:: with SMTP id o6mr2628489lfd.200.1585237800778; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 08:50:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.14] (h-122-211.A530.priv.bahnhof.se. [213.80.122.211]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i30sm1971866lfp.36.2020.03.26.08.49.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 26 Mar 2020 08:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
From: Ragnar Sundblad <ragge@netnod.se>
In-Reply-To: <49F99D81-EDA9-4ABA-9131-620CDE68311A@tislabs.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 16:49:58 +0100
Cc: NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>, ntp-chairs@ietf.org, Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FAF8E835-6B5E-4811-997E-8D0933B58422@netnod.se>
References: <F5D62F1F-6705-4DEE-8A24-C7DAEAC02AB0@tislabs.com> <43842926-38F3-4274-904B-AEBE8248E9A2@tislabs.com> <99D9C210-3F59-405E-8F74-E4DED592493F@tislabs.com> <49F99D81-EDA9-4ABA-9131-620CDE68311A@tislabs.com>
To: Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/P0WZMuCcRh9oyi4Q2VeBAIHoptY>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] comments on draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-23
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 15:50:20 -0000

Hi Sandy,

Your input is still valuable, we do want to understand if there is
anything broken, now and as long as this spec is in use.

Thanks for all your work!

We were going to prepare a reply to you, but maybe it is not needed.
It seems you are ok with most solutions.

Regarding how the different errors should be handled, there was some
extra text added in Section 4.1.3 in v27:
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ntp-using-nts-for-ntp-28#section-4.1.3>

We will go through your comments and address those that remain.

Ragnar

> On 26 Mar 2020, at 16:33, Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> wrote:
> 
> Gad.  I was so absorbed in constructing a detailed reply that I missed the fact that publication had been decided.
> 
> —Sandy
> 
>> On Mar 26, 2020, at 8:03 AM, Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> wrote:
>> 
>> My responses took the form of general comments in the message text and a bunch of detailed comments in an attachment.  I’m going to respond to whether they were were addressed in v26 in two messages.  One will cover the detailed comments, this time inline the message text (an attachment was a mistake).  The other will cover the general comments.
>> 
>> —Sandy
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email