Re: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ogud-dhc-udp-time-option-01.txt

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Mon, 02 December 2013 22:03 UTC

Return-Path: <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3966C1ADF97 for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 14:03:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.791
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.791 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MSrDAHpMQ-dO for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 14:03:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092E51ADF96 for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 14:03:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F073286DAEB for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 22:03:46 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Received: from mail1.ntp.org (mail1.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::5]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C243586D422 for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 22:03:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org ([2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtps (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <marka@isc.org>) id 1VnbaZ-000GBN-7h for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 22:03:37 +0000
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47B33C94C0; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 22:03:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isc.org; s=dkim2012; t=1386021809; bh=xaXM16kQLJhvMxMUPLWuhXhPSHitZKWkP9oD0TH0Ko0=; h=To:Cc:From:References:Subject:In-reply-to:Date; b=b1+cMHZapIZCdDaamQbo4Hf1X9sFBVN9g9NrEUdcuPvT5wlQ996rb1JtcWVCSzwO6 5GPiPdi4YAjndWAH8zsmshtJ0xTy/U/4MsBlZBGGhM0cBPH0wtXkkweN4GY8kRwB+V eiEQ2ldqbZ93BZ1HdtBP3SmZrjXqs45pLcEWxG7w=
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 22:03:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A24D2160436; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 22:10:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (c211-30-183-50.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.183.50]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D36316034F; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 22:10:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rock.dv.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85669B04BBE; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 09:03:11 +1100 (EST)
To: Harlan Stenn <stenn@ntp.org>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <20131202044734.B78E0406060@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net> <529C1A31.2080900@ntp.org> <258D838F-F4BA-45D2-AA41-BB05E3AB147C@ogud.com> <529CA616.3010402@ntp.org> <19575403-444E-4CBA-8818-5F46328787AE@bsdimp.com> <E1VnZdi-0000fA-CY@stenn.ntp.org> <220ED02D-AE73-436F-A81F-BDF54611173B@bsdimp.com> <E1Vnb6D-0000lV-Gy@stenn.ntp.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Dec 2013 21:32:13 -0000." <E1Vnb6D-0000lV-Gy@stenn.ntp.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 09:03:11 +1100
Message-Id: <20131202220311.85669B04BBE@rock.dv.isc.org>
X-DCC--Metrics: post.isc.org; whitelist
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:4f8:0:2::2b
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: marka@isc.org
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org)
Cc: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>, Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com>, NTP Working Group <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>, "dhcwg@ietf.org WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ogud-dhc-udp-time-option-01.txt
X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol <ntpwg.lists.ntp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/options/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/ntpwg>
List-Post: <mailto:ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org
Sender: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org

The inception and expiration times in RRSIGs is specified as seconds
since 00:00:00 Jan 1 1970 UTC excluding leap seconds modulo 2^32.

There are no recommended fudge factors to use when evaluating these
times though named sets the expire time to 3600 seconds in the past
by default when generating RRSIGs.  I believe the other signers do
similar.  I've considered making the inception timestamp a whole
day in the past to cope with badly set timezones.

The signature validity intervals are on the order of days.  Named
defaults to 30 days.  They are regenerated about a week before they
are due expire if not already regenerated due to zone content
changes.  The records should expire from caches before they become
invalid if re-signing is being done properly.

So if the validator and the signer are both within 30 minutes of
the true time validation should succeed.

Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
_______________________________________________
ntpwg mailing list
ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg