IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ogud-dhc-udp-time-option-01.txt

Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> Mon, 02 December 2013 14:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 678611AE49E for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 06:38:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L7F-pgl6wmad for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 06:38:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 051221AE49D for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 06:38:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F8F86DAA9 for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 14:38:32 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Received: from mail1.ntp.org (mail1.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::5]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4184986D422 for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 14:38:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from exprod7og119.obsmtp.com ([64.18.2.16]) by mail1.ntp.org with smtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>) id 1VnUdg-000DNI-LQ for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 14:38:22 +0000
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob119.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUpybW8bxSKr6MfRJR9xJBltd3uZh3X5c@postini.com; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 06:38:20 PST
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86AD11B81DC for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 06:38:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7217E190043; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 06:38:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.10.40] (192.168.1.10) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 06:38:19 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\))
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <F53087EB-C5E0-4305-929D-5BFEA3C266AD@bsdimp.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 09:38:12 -0500
Message-ID: <E96CB645-2197-4475-B760-71E8B686C023@nominum.com>
References: <20131202044734.B78E0406060@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net> <D5CCC8A9-10FF-4D57-AB42-D39AB4D8730F@nominum.com> <F53087EB-C5E0-4305-929D-5BFEA3C266AD@bsdimp.com>
To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822)
X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.10]
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 64.18.2.16
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: Ted.Lemon@nominum.com
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org)
Cc: NTP Working Group <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>, "dhcwg@ietf.org WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>, Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ogud-dhc-udp-time-option-01.txt
X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol <ntpwg.lists.ntp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/options/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/ntpwg>
List-Post: <mailto:ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org
Sender: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org

On Dec 2, 2013, at 1:44 AM, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:
> So 5 years in the future is no problem?

I was being mildly facetious, since this is a question that's pretty easy to answer, but difficult to answer precisely.   The answer depends on the zone configuration, but generally speaking "within days" is probably good enough.   See http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6781#section-4.4.2.2

_______________________________________________
ntpwg mailing list
ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email