IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ogud-dhc-udp-time-option-01.txt

Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> Mon, 02 December 2013 17:13 UTC

Return-Path: <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91AD1AD845 for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 09:13:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hUMjuHmqUVm1 for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 09:13:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F2CF1AD7C2 for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 09:13:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (lists.ntp.org [149.20.68.7]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1391086DAF7 for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 17:13:04 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Received: from mail1.ntp.org (mail1.ntp.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff7:1::5]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7917786D422 for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 17:12:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from exprod7og104.obsmtp.com ([64.18.2.161]) by mail1.ntp.org with smtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>) id 1VnX3I-000EOG-LM for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 17:12:58 +0000
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob104.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUpy/mEBKf7aQXl5XBcSapD93ZrbbAmP2@postini.com; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 09:12:56 PST
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA7731B82E6 for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 09:12:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE797190043; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 09:12:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.10.40] (192.168.1.10) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 09:12:55 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\))
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <19575403-444E-4CBA-8818-5F46328787AE@bsdimp.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 12:12:48 -0500
Message-ID: <4AA650D3-2AD2-4C83-8450-DC3926AC9416@nominum.com>
References: <20131202044734.B78E0406060@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net> <529C1A31.2080900@ntp.org> <258D838F-F4BA-45D2-AA41-BB05E3AB147C@ogud.com> <529CA616.3010402@ntp.org> <19575403-444E-4CBA-8818-5F46328787AE@bsdimp.com>
To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822)
X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.10]
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 64.18.2.161
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: Ted.Lemon@nominum.com
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org)
Cc: Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>, Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com>, NTP Working Group <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>, "dhcwg@ietf.org WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ntpwg] [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ogud-dhc-udp-time-option-01.txt
X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol <ntpwg.lists.ntp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/options/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/ntpwg>
List-Post: <mailto:ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org
Sender: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org

On Dec 2, 2013, at 10:32 AM, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:
> Assuming the tolerance for this application is >> 1s, this won't matter, but might be worth specifying that during a leap second, the value returned shall be either the value of the prior second or the value of the next second to make it conform to most current usage.

I think the expectation is that the time will be updated with a more accurate mechanism later, and an error of 1s is not worth worrying about for typical devices, so this is almost certainly overkill.

_______________________________________________
ntpwg mailing list
ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email