IETF Logo Mail Archive

[ntpwg] Antw: Re: call for adoption (draft-dfranke-ntp-data-minimization)

"Ulrich Windl" <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> Tue, 28 March 2017 06:05 UTC

Return-Path: <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E21D4126C89 for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 23:05:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aYsn_wndBiMV for <ietfarch-ntp-archives-ahFae6za@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 23:05:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.ntp.org (psp3.ntp.org [185.140.48.241]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F34C1296A6 for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 23:05:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psp3.ntp.org (localhost.ntp.org [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB23C86DBEC for <ntp-archives-ahFae6za@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 06:05:38 +0000 (UTC)
X-Original-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Delivered-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
Received: from mail1.ntp.org (fortinet.ntp.org [10.224.90.254]) by lists.ntp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF05686D77E for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 06:05:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rrzmta1.uni-regensburg.de ([194.94.155.51]) by mail1.ntp.org with esmtps (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>) id 1cskFx-000Pan-Nt for ntpwg@lists.ntp.org; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 06:05:33 +0000
Received: from rrzmta1.uni-regensburg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 3BC725AFFE for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 08:05:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de (gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de [132.199.5.51]) by rrzmta1.uni-regensburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE33C5AF38 for <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 08:05:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from uni-regensburg-smtp1-MTA by gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 08:05:23 +0200
Message-Id: <58D9FD22020000A1000255AD@gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 14.2.2
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 08:05:22 +0200
From: Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org, mlichvar@redhat.com
References: <CA564C5C-6CED-4810-BA2F-5433F2525249@isoc.org> <20170327133842.GK8192@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20170327133842.GK8192@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 194.94.155.51
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail1.ntp.org)
Subject: [ntpwg] Antw: Re: call for adoption (draft-dfranke-ntp-data-minimization)
X-BeenThere: ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Working Group for Network Time Protocol <ntpwg.lists.ntp.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/options/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/ntpwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg>, <mailto:ntpwg-request@lists.ntp.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org
Sender: ntpwg <ntpwg-bounces+ntp-archives-ahfae6za=lists.ietf.org@lists.ntp.org>

>>> Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> schrieb am 27.03.2017 um 15:38 in
Nachricht <20170327133842.GK8192@localhost>:
> On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 09:52:11PM +0000, Karen O'Donoghue wrote:
>> We agreed to adopt this at the last IETF meeting, but we didn’t actually

> issue a call for adoption.
>> 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dfranke-ntp-data-minimization 
> 
> Just a minor issue, but I'd like to ask the group to consider setting
> the precision field to 32 instead of 0 to make it clear that the
> timestamps are completely random in the original sense that only bits
> below precision can be random. This might be useful in debugging and
> traffic analysis.

What's the problem with 0?

> 
> -- 
> Miroslav Lichvar
> _______________________________________________
> ntpwg mailing list
> ntpwg@lists.ntp.org 
> http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg 



_______________________________________________
ntpwg mailing list
ntpwg@lists.ntp.org
http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/ntpwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email