Re: [Ntp] The bump, or why NTP v5 must specify impulse response

Doug Arnold <doug.arnold@meinberg-usa.com> Tue, 21 April 2020 14:50 UTC

Return-Path: <doug.arnold@meinberg-usa.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32F2A3A0115 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 07:50:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.053
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.053 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.82, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=meinbergfunkuhren.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2SpojS2SSlUG for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 07:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR01-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr130072.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.13.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 431833A02C1 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=WNrW9OhguL6Dz07CUG5/UIm+2HkGQFX5A1R9y/gyWlQ4nA+sVbWPczN7Tn4vnQwULDe8PzTO1LI2W5cqt26qMhY+mtC5y318i2s+UQGj07nbtNTZO97+mppX38/R5A52g6b/6uCDT/9mmKGc6rj4A1vPdyPYynG6k9oZbtwRXoOJuThrVgF4CGXIUU2aDSoOHkXzmWxqzo4OpF3nGW2Vs21uswptJCyrmS//2lRavmiGCX/rNp/BuwLUHoD3O4rnxeqZ2UwGhJcyDhKTC01DPvEnkcx4nij1IHYylxItPwwOrUXREtzk6V/JJrPIlq42SwcaOy49lRD4ka5WTzVNTQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=SFsbn/F8t6muMfuCFPCmKzXApVgnKpms3WpU1C8LU+E=; b=kjjj94vDr4xn5Qat+uDdyYIX7nmV9O1pCgj/8jKxjxqb8ugVJww/gFVWpPaLW/s9OLdgt5bjAqYAHP8cW3cOcuunYRtOLNYzY2XDitUlwrWnIdjGbpaU8uI2EldQ/gvoC2csS0dqrQSsWwnDBFume3Ak+ZxGewGjyI3Hwxsve5ZpdriDThQYC8dy5XoCqgBvTa6gCkEhADn0LrR7nkJEX7FKedcl64Gi7uL3N35gSFoH2/qqzEuTxXmb2rxZOKh7zWr1LLokemCzLrDAmnfngO8rjuzdxJlzxxRxx6vZD/yJAK2iiw3KDXXX4zvSVs32zPPmg7eRLk5KC1NOhe2NVg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=meinberg-usa.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=meinberg-usa.com; dkim=pass header.d=meinberg-usa.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=meinbergfunkuhren.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-meinbergfunkuhren-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=SFsbn/F8t6muMfuCFPCmKzXApVgnKpms3WpU1C8LU+E=; b=I04Fjo99FvlpzQj1ADS1K+desVsXIkPJ9D5JhoWJ3MyN05jajiNs6f76rlvA7qrYMvkHAfeB6Ifci1+WlF9gm3Lz/4mpacb2E9LMYs32iIEzGAG9T7+fpsh/hZWlyfBIa81ZY7UXNpkjgbBaPNkglFT6EywQ6+M4pmqCXk2XeXE=
Received: from DB8PR02MB5611.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:10:eb::31) by DB8PR02MB5467.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:10:e4::18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2921.29; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 14:49:47 +0000
Received: from DB8PR02MB5611.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9525:30ab:defe:44a6]) by DB8PR02MB5611.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9525:30ab:defe:44a6%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2921.030; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 14:49:47 +0000
From: Doug Arnold <doug.arnold@meinberg-usa.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, Harlan Stenn <stenn@nwtime.org>, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Dieter Sibold <dsibold.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>, NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>, Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Ntp] The bump, or why NTP v5 must specify impulse response
Thread-Index: AQHWERdg/8i/rvFkyUOx/r80OrpRSqh3G4MAgABSFYCAAAKRAIAADJ2AgAAM+D+AAPEegIABe/OAgAA9WACAAVTegIAIIYmAgAAKgqo=
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 14:49:47 +0000
Message-ID: <DB8PR02MB561150F0CC8EDD04D192E814CFD50@DB8PR02MB5611.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CACsn0c=zzDKP6iBjPJWGF0rkqSaY3AY738ynGwDZO14sdBJ-Bg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJm83bB2A3VUxXX47Y0ubmS9Xne7PRSyV_xHY_D9YvHjqE-vFA@mail.gmail.com> <CACsn0cm3jpKZTUQ=novTgVaFhc1xCJgmUF3oOgdrzQa-HgOCUQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJm83bAqbMMs2W3SyH+3c17wcC85paY4-_jk2SxczgsxBLyYyA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJm83bAQeR_6U3jgmbWzdus3pu+OO2_KP+M9RtbCFYOfDQy4dw@mail.gmail.com> <DB8PR02MB56111CCA23CDCF97A3C9F3E8CFDD0@DB8PR02MB5611.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> <F7E5836A-4C7A-4A1A-B769-65EADE2C8F5C@gmail.com> <7d909ae3-a830-1270-6920-fa088a56525e@nwtime.org> <6C9832A9-E18B-4DE2-934F-9E471FC22F7B@akamai.com> <bc7920e2-dc81-ba7f-ec24-7926cda8589d@nwtime.org>, <681BBE0F-7665-4CB1-8373-9A688508FAE7@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <681BBE0F-7665-4CB1-8373-9A688508FAE7@akamai.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=doug.arnold@meinberg-usa.com;
x-originating-ip: [64.30.82.72]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 99921d66-7fc6-4d27-1201-08d7e6033ccc
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DB8PR02MB5467:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DB8PR02MB5467BB7992FF7FAD77EBF462CFD50@DB8PR02MB5467.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:4303;
x-forefront-prvs: 038002787A
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:DB8PR02MB5611.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(10009020)(346002)(366004)(52536014)(53546011)(508600001)(26005)(8936002)(81156014)(86362001)(7696005)(8676002)(55016002)(110136005)(44832011)(6506007)(71200400001)(54906003)(91956017)(66946007)(66476007)(5660300002)(4326008)(76116006)(66556008)(64756008)(66446008)(9686003)(2906002)(186003)(19627405001)(33656002)(4744005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: meinberg-usa.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 54h9EtI8XT4151KoXdY5Nfg376rOwLI/3G1sb9dSU5S02OE0ahSbL53q/adt3TsyshKEDOVtzdebXJdeitHbBf9Vq84mULeFvuXarWCgXUW7nnMRnvRwJ5ytmsgjJe1Rko90uIgTAxGvSWbF3WqYxXhLqf7E2/fjp7/2Ian+I3oCTqoHxpQtanYDyNYcAd+6wW3LUQc/6Cf4Mw1LjFPQX3QrJbO/kqCRMhVFBLEw72MI2eI9g6C80A7xsPgO2EzyMlLebtweDEC3aONA63mS2INl9eq5YjJNtfqlU3lOQVrdo82DXBHyE/eRCII3L+2PiWaOUPdKArW/72GfgOyLNjAKuFCo5ybkyX4XTjU0esz9u9tdvaHABh7L+VWVBPVhdSFWHdY0n55aJtjzlk5//pPesshDaOzaitB7444AG9nBWfTjliVkJJloc11fcri8
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: ry3iq3PL+Ne+DwlvvSiyVGzXdyM9f5eysetMWoLh0rSayuMOgF0W4Z0ThtLsQl1VgWEAo1LfSiuPun35HpHi3bV63y8ELoeDM+io1IZNgsYdA8R1Vp1VC8Igz2wdjtoK3VupeQj/goSG+VC3LeVZyQ==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DB8PR02MB561150F0CC8EDD04D192E814CFD50DB8PR02MB5611eurp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: meinberg-usa.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 99921d66-7fc6-4d27-1201-08d7e6033ccc
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 Apr 2020 14:49:47.4582 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: d59904cd-769f-4368-8bd0-f5f435893a38
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: od5ZmsX1mu7mJxUJhUH16u8GFnuiRRAeMFSjA2QHnt9fs/Tl6cRTiTjs7beF+VFZ1Ym5Nx6BduX36Y6ndoS857SvP9YPjsWlnYt7Ul9uZ7s=
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB8PR02MB5467
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/X_Kpzxbf0eZQxIny9KcTS30C-vY>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] The bump, or why NTP v5 must specify impulse response
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 14:50:12 -0000

I would expect that the packet format and general packet exchange sequence would not change.  I would expect that the packet rate, clock steering algorithms, and security mechanisms might.

Doug

________________________________
From: Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 7:08 AM
To: Harlan Stenn <stenn@nwtime.org>; Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>; Dieter Sibold <dsibold.ietf@gmail.com>; Doug Arnold <doug.arnold@meinberg-usa.com>
Cc: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>; NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>; Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] The bump, or why NTP v5 must specify impulse response


>    NTP is a combination of two parts:

Thank you.

So if NTPv5 said that it only changes the protocol, and not the algorithms, that would be okay?