IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] [EXT] Re: The bump, or why NTP v5 must specify impulse response

Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org> Tue, 14 April 2020 23:19 UTC

Return-Path: <krose@krose.org>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907F23A1250 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 16:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=krose.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2TItJiYIZDuW for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 16:19:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBAAF3A1253 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 16:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb2c.google.com with SMTP id 204so8142820ybw.5 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 16:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=krose.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=FbcRMYT1c10b7qf13gObmq59rfvaPnRdJzCGGeoKyIQ=; b=k7OhUF/sTBMEyJnnowS+PT+oJ0e2ZHvjdZeR11Mp39uWjp5cnLr1Fciz1ylhgEr6uI M9xRlE4sIG+ZB1xe0G5PFtym+sXCfnawfJSwiuhnLUltIr20G2nr29/B8R9/25bu007l OvXF+VgeTBTzOTM9WI/7nbxxcBQUezsM3KpEY=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FbcRMYT1c10b7qf13gObmq59rfvaPnRdJzCGGeoKyIQ=; b=lPcqy0pqVMKNA4Xx5pLQXsZCTLWLQDZ6fzJ8VA++CRVKYrTHklRT2KFzS3C986UIiS d+MyNqWtcZO/QIEW0TfwWoYpzbRfVC8+0twIdmGEAdwgHr8rBPwQcPFPUO71jPQ346fr tPsVgV5zlq7R+as22OVEXgqeK6Lq0DMBM9mX+6rKcQrq/8uC6mdADHIUq6r2wgj7tyDk SPxD89wE7FonMPa6Q2cRWfE8leng1oEl35N/tLCeqFBEakTjyGfrfZ7i7p8skEo46XeV 0zmgUrD2TUP0VWEp5YZjH3XPELBCdDZmUteno6ff155yV8PuNWXf/gdA6Yed9FeHHYPC ROHw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuadpXOmWTuzvfuc0gQ0HiE5sxHFx1jD85A4JACc/kdk6fd5XkJK xDRVcGKx9czz9MsdCt0i86twafmXRRedt0ONU4f0Rg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKnOjBLhSFu+TbM0wvR3RoyHpMXW69UHyuhb+Lw18czEdbNcbxUehR33FgIL3nh5DKjUDWbOguA3tieiPJVwXo=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:4e8a:: with SMTP id c132mr3581479ybb.401.1586906362758; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 16:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACsn0c=zzDKP6iBjPJWGF0rkqSaY3AY738ynGwDZO14sdBJ-Bg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJm83bB2A3VUxXX47Y0ubmS9Xne7PRSyV_xHY_D9YvHjqE-vFA@mail.gmail.com> <CACsn0cm3jpKZTUQ=novTgVaFhc1xCJgmUF3oOgdrzQa-HgOCUQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJm83bAqbMMs2W3SyH+3c17wcC85paY4-_jk2SxczgsxBLyYyA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJm83bAQeR_6U3jgmbWzdus3pu+OO2_KP+M9RtbCFYOfDQy4dw@mail.gmail.com> <DB8PR02MB56111CCA23CDCF97A3C9F3E8CFDD0@DB8PR02MB5611.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> <4536_1586860567_5E959217_4536_221_1_20200414103543.GC1945@localhost> <9a170387-201a-6ddd-3515-64413f2dee02@rz.uni-regensburg.de> <D0895C18-7E2E-40E2-97D6-42484978C784@akamai.com> <CANCZdfofP1+n51DdiqOG_aFz6wuvsq=SuR5xkcsn+BzerjU33w@mail.gmail.com> <4272F78D-3143-4A4F-9B1C-FDC600155AE6@akamai.com> <8979441c-2594-462c-a918-f5dd840adceb@nwtime.org>
In-Reply-To: <8979441c-2594-462c-a918-f5dd840adceb@nwtime.org>
From: Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 19:19:11 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJU8_nW3Fsw_6r1eMMQZk8=iq9dBfvWimc3g0cYk90-8gfLRmw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Harlan Stenn <stenn@nwtime.org>
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>, Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>, "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000b5a9a05a3486e6f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/Wy6R-M9l81L4OEKvelvuwFUywkM>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] [EXT] Re: The bump, or why NTP v5 must specify impulse response
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 23:19:26 -0000

On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 7:00 PM Harlan Stenn <stenn@nwtime.org> wrote:

> On 4/14/2020 2:19 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:
> > *>*But neither of these are likely effects large enough to matter to ntp.
> >
> >
> >
> > NIST recalibrated because of gravity/general-relativity changes when
> > their F1 clock changed floors (https://www.wired.com/2007/12/time-nist/)
>
> That's not really anywhere near the same thing.


I think Rich was just continuing Ulrich's joke.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email