IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] The bump, or why NTP v5 must specify impulse response

Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com> Thu, 16 April 2020 21:44 UTC

Return-Path: <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F8C3A117A for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 14:44:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vZjeH5K-RLVl for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 14:44:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12d.google.com (mail-il1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 058583A1179 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 14:44:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id d2so188595ilc.0 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 14:44:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3DaAbJBXg5EXMt87XXRStJkblL4Dfx80i8f6E6oIpfc=; b=uZ1Szb6ONre4pQpVCfrXOMEIzlcTakpcizKDO5Lb6ICrxgbcTwfZ1B0KUWEbyCTuRH 0UKTY7PE+eckd4Q+GX4zYWLWMq5M02/lYTz2CIYVBMrtnmm9AqP34xGKALQHhMT6BHw5 wXd+0kD/GZks8mvVJ1iSngyDx+LWDbZdARxrpJdJm4KtA3VpTOQi7aHI/KnX4bfzV7yR P0d2zSIjfQHeCuFByhsYev2bAm3sHH8AAmRQfRkZn04ql5IVYbQWoA2F8hfqtw1f5VDO R67TM+8IjKYNDd1g8Y5nK5P2gTyYHrjhObq3XtlkRyJWVgWPUpUK7pBgsJdOgrH5huXg qPDA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3DaAbJBXg5EXMt87XXRStJkblL4Dfx80i8f6E6oIpfc=; b=lRkQCmHRNZ0ZIckmkypUZBK8Oucj7/6eGAQwNXtuM7I0jW+SCTmV54JQDyI8fcjBT5 D2DITtzsjy0VJnjEESpC/dU4HbYeCOrgxE5Xv5HW12DSbdhNQQsUEpSdv0mojJow9SVK IbG+qRq8f2YBlZMTZHPID/+ILgpfotN/AnQNlMBnudYB8nWBU3+hplg8yutzvyz59sm1 cmU/7vcHqwbQVArRIbrhM9NEwvkrXaNUIJk4lSqXBaMVoGb9vgUc0SiPOMnOg1+MHFfx xxXleHOz5TMMI4Kvp5bgPKiH995outo51A4aQcKG7ODGg+u9PLXGbiYo6iqS8UD/596n DoqQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZqhi3pkCQowCnnEyJRu4UD9e6KcgPtnhr7aizMfHO+StzwBjUs kuY4ix6kmoE/jqcnTZ/nNT0av5AhFElpyzjTI9GGsxuk
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypI0nh6UJDJGDh65B2D2caEWZU330hQgZBS88gPnL/3E5JydeP8xNybP0ev/LeMu+XpTYnIu444HmyjspIObsOg=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:d447:: with SMTP id r7mr12853980ilm.76.1587073453988; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 14:44:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACsn0cm3jpKZTUQ=novTgVaFhc1xCJgmUF3oOgdrzQa-HgOCUQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJm83bAqbMMs2W3SyH+3c17wcC85paY4-_jk2SxczgsxBLyYyA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJm83bAQeR_6U3jgmbWzdus3pu+OO2_KP+M9RtbCFYOfDQy4dw@mail.gmail.com> <DB8PR02MB56111CCA23CDCF97A3C9F3E8CFDD0@DB8PR02MB5611.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> <F7E5836A-4C7A-4A1A-B769-65EADE2C8F5C@gmail.com> <7d909ae3-a830-1270-6920-fa088a56525e@nwtime.org> <6C9832A9-E18B-4DE2-934F-9E471FC22F7B@akamai.com> <bc7920e2-dc81-ba7f-ec24-7926cda8589d@nwtime.org> <alpine.DEB.2.20.2004161430210.5561@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <93795d4a-25e7-c918-47d4-44aa6d92ee5e@nwtime.org> <20200416135547.GF412294@roeckx.be> <2d483354-a707-fbca-e914-cbe1479a4c25@nwtime.org>
In-Reply-To: <2d483354-a707-fbca-e914-cbe1479a4c25@nwtime.org>
From: Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 17:44:02 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJm83bAMxGrx_PSPQUjERzT2TT_0Tiutx=R0LRF2m9bY4QTj4w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Harlan Stenn <stenn@nwtime.org>
Cc: NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/pvMsms1FytGJcma-jdSY_mFL-68>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] The bump, or why NTP v5 must specify impulse response
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 21:44:17 -0000

On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 5:13 PM Harlan Stenn <stenn@nwtime.org> wrote:
> There are cases with regulatory requirements here.

What regulations govern NTP's clock synchronization algorithm?

> There are liability risks.

Who risks being liable to whom for what?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email