IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] Resending: Thoughts on draft-ietf-ntp-refid-updates

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Fri, 20 July 2018 18:33 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4641C1310CC for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 11:33:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I9S9222rOh-I for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 11:32:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0168130F4D for <ntp@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Jul 2018 11:32:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:57784) by ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.139]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1fgaD0-0006v2-hw (Exim 4.91) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Fri, 20 Jul 2018 19:32:54 +0100
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 19:32:54 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
cc: Martin Burnicki <martin.burnicki@meinberg.de>, ntp@ietf.org, Ask Bjørn Hansen <ask@develooper.com>, Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfp+aa5Yi1TmTsPXCc0+EkK=pZWYhxeC7fSPsRv1XFUpKA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1807201928340.5965@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <5B2795C6-F78E-40FB-8B98-790E50228808@redfish-solutions.com> <5EB0F348-AC75-4C29-A576-FA590305EA2E@netnod.se> <C7C5AC86-1488-452B-8C1D-05F5151D2AFB@develooper.com> <8e0a4de9-71b3-04ec-59fb-4431ea0a2d2d@meinberg.de> <CAJm83bAZcxw6GuXMwJiy0dNJ7RmjJJaXeSNzwQ_5_0xCXUKH+A@mail.gmail.com> <02114e33-dc23-3055-2a89-8be89b80733a@meinberg.de> <CANCZdfp+aa5Yi1TmTsPXCc0+EkK=pZWYhxeC7fSPsRv1XFUpKA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/_5QHHnh1MjH8eDtVavGGq4r55g0>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Resending: Thoughts on draft-ietf-ntp-refid-updates
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 18:33:01 -0000

Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:
>
> I'd add to that some authenticated source of truth for leap seconds over
> the net in a standardized format, since we're already asking for ponies
> :)

My zone with the leapsecond records is signed with DNSSEC, but you might
argue whether the signatures authenticate what you want them to :-)

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Rockall, Malin, Hebrides: Northwest 3 or 4 backing southwest 4 or 5,
occasionally 6 later in Hebrides. Slight or moderate. Drizzle and fog patches,
mainly later. Moderate or good, occasionally very poor later.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email