IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Ntp] Antw: Antw: Re: Resending: Thoughts on draft-ietf-ntp-refid-updates

"Ulrich Windl" <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> Mon, 23 July 2018 07:11 UTC

Return-Path: <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED0A4130F88 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 00:11:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PwkW49M4LhAi for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 00:11:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rrzmta1.uni-regensburg.de (rrzmta1.uni-regensburg.de [194.94.155.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88388130E57 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 00:11:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rrzmta1.uni-regensburg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 34BE45E786 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 09:11:49 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de (gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de [132.199.5.51]) by rrzmta1.uni-regensburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B224F9DA for <ntp@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 09:11:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from uni-regensburg-smtp1-MTA by gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 23 Jul 2018 09:11:48 +0200
Message-Id: <5B557FB2020000A10002C743@gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 18.0.1
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 09:11:46 +0200
From: Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
To: Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>, martin.burnicki@meinberg.de, Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de>
Cc: Ask Bjørn Hansen <ask@develooper.com>, "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>
References: <5B2795C6-F78E-40FB-8B98-790E50228808@redfish-solutions.com> <5EB0F348-AC75-4C29-A576-FA590305EA2E@netnod.se> <C7C5AC86-1488-452B-8C1D-05F5151D2AFB@develooper.com> <8e0a4de9-71b3-04ec-59fb-4431ea0a2d2d@meinberg.de> <CAJm83bAZcxw6GuXMwJiy0dNJ7RmjJJaXeSNzwQ_5_0xCXUKH+A@mail.gmail.com> <5B5571D6020000A10002C737@gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de>
In-Reply-To: <5B5571D6020000A10002C737@gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/dbhlKberGAq9jcXgeqBT3qPyNaw>
Subject: [Ntp] Antw: Antw: Re: Resending: Thoughts on draft-ietf-ntp-refid-updates
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 07:11:52 -0000

>>> "Ulrich Windl" <Ulrich.Windl@rz.uni-regensburg.de> schrieb am 23.07.2018 um
08:12 in Nachricht <5B5571D6020000A10002C737@gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de>:
[...]
> Actually what I was thinking is: Why npt start to adjust the duration of a

s/npt/not/ #Sorry!

> second once the leap second is announced (6 months ahead)? That way no 
> normal
> system will ever notice. The disadvantage is that all refclock systems will
> have to agree on it. That's quite unlikely, however, especially for GPS...
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email