IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] Splitting the Roughtime draft?

Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Sun, 31 January 2021 16:46 UTC

Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2559D3A10E9 for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 08:46:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4VK96mahtqTB for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 08:46:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ed1-x530.google.com (mail-ed1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::530]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F27A33A10E8 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 08:46:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ed1-x530.google.com with SMTP id j13so16193763edp.2 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 08:46:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ob7TAyCWbbCt0G1dGBP3Fjf+cVytjCHp1mRvyWXdMN4=; b=HJMHaaP+Q7GtKxf5+JHTfsWD7Q6hBUx3DEcyCmIYtmHlva6X7YV/qER7ySUBa1slgE lS/935qc9XpVApV+WdlZ77+WN/WtaJrskrlOyulslFIcB9b6aJK4CWotdIy3cxftr2Mr LHZE45gLUR5X7IIxBTzF9T2NuIkpTtSdF9s3tZWDZEozCnLDzWJrJE2jCzF9+PrCuRAe plKFxaAesdUp36685bpXdNp/J/Ul5O0Ux28j/nHSEAr5SY5PlMp7JoncI471tRNXNcZz MtRjm3T+w497kf/DlAa6DKA4z+tP1rKrQMAsqAjSDWbOFRxDxuW33vtD+cCMZKsm0tUF V/MA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ob7TAyCWbbCt0G1dGBP3Fjf+cVytjCHp1mRvyWXdMN4=; b=idmuZqOeoUPG0gStBWHYWka858lXsitSrrkaprikvl/yjbfTGfGnADv43NifWh+Nd2 hEG9lVwnM3XbXQDVULtLFR/Xre12OfWV/LYhQuOPdzvbXkBkLE76TabiluTJfRZv05yi afqT8JL4VxxHjNeZzKCBprHWUrVaJYgfqOMrt171VwcYwaIBh/OL3NmkD1lt55bogWte yLXizqmtc+IxP/rQgTEcE5k9QfPGT78JspFNq29Xz0gGhJBZOmY/rVFIBt4TSNcQKnyX F35CU22+W8KcCy63xEhgWpGmzcJ2XvjZzAuCSMdb6PsJne2jKEklko9cH8AC6rP7PzGv hpMA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532wH68Gi6/OAHE82yIJHg2OUALtkQlTKioBZN1ImAdjIBMbhGQu HBFXTGfoYtI+itfS2d1iIHa4LtcLB66vnO0J9mw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw4/MjRravvvRpSrdqg4WLwPNYK7VbIGNUp02TY2GU9v82POhyEhT4wgB3MVCpJnHbE3w66uIHPVKVupf7JWd4=
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d649:: with SMTP id v9mr14757037edr.383.1612111592314; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 08:46:32 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACsn0cm0N8otXKhCTRofjx4eHS8Po8-75C20YHMbr2ZAaU3w-A@mail.gmail.com> <CAJm83bD6YWS25aRv+b9zEWj+FtnZePmjjA_yLbuKSKzphys-8w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJm83bD6YWS25aRv+b9zEWj+FtnZePmjjA_yLbuKSKzphys-8w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2021 08:46:21 -0800
Message-ID: <CACsn0ckxgs=eTSGtZsjE8ysgV0_EKtYvK4hpcrTEq383rrS=iw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com>
Cc: NTP WG <ntp@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/acxhwkBHXX7lEjezmxX7wwpWQMQ>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Splitting the Roughtime draft?
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2021 16:46:35 -0000

On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 5:16 PM Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> SGTM. Impeaching a Roughtime server should anyway be rare enough that "write an angry blog post and submit it to Hacker News" is a scalable enough protocol as a stopgap.

Isn't that the protocol we use for CAs via
mozilla.dev.security.policy? Maybe I should set up
comp.security.roughtime for similar purposes.

--
Astra mortemque praestare gradatim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email