IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ntp] Calls for Adoption -- NTP Extension Field drafts -- Four separate drafts

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 28 August 2019 16:03 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ntp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318B212023E for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 09:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qTNXS-1nOsAP for <ntp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 09:03:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DCC1120232 for <ntp@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 09:03:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050096.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id x7SG2s26028567; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 17:03:48 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=OIv87aYiYflBl6TV9v4hsuB0ZNH3yDKQlmuUcwD9010=; b=c3bBpKiaGP3+MqLYEyhJg4wV30ipRDKut+5/9T8GpeHP+Mm07czABWnRgMJTrn+8lkrc CYOPmxFiFBxgJi+SKaeay5kojEp125/2di4Dd2iBAx1iFg7auTEQF+JCmvyZnn6tGeQV CF2k5HdTXYRd+uW4XkfBByFn27DlfyOJqHyvIfxrPWZJJsUN0sdervaO8DGPX2xAXVTU tOuPq/rREkJJFA9YcPvIhl+rABDp0Yd1JA3vu0Bolxyk4oKzlq+yxgFxJfQOnEuxLbCM 7tT5PW4WFzyuJSgnBDyjXuahAzmiJAOj4IDDr/YSb0o391sMQmut8EGe8kH2ABUoy1by XA==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint1 (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [184.51.33.18] (may be forged)) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2ujwn6gvqu-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 28 Aug 2019 17:03:48 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x7SG3RW9022267; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 12:03:47 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.33]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2uk0jw4fk0-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 28 Aug 2019 12:03:47 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.105) by usma1ex-dag3mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.54) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 12:03:46 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 12:03:46 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.005; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 12:03:46 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>
CC: "ntp@ietf.org" <ntp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ntp] Calls for Adoption -- NTP Extension Field drafts -- Four separate drafts
Thread-Index: AQHVXVHbI2WiZV0iSEake7pw0tyUAacQzEeA///tbIA=
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 16:03:46 +0000
Message-ID: <21F4C31E-1625-4068-978D-9802A6863EA0@akamai.com>
References: <1B4A56E7-16A6-4767-9268-BCF4BEB9A247@isoc.org> <CAJm83bDBtPmE2yHxaiuouNh-cM4+F2pVrtg6u=AS17847d2U4A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJm83bDBtPmE2yHxaiuouNh-cM4+F2pVrtg6u=AS17847d2U4A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1c.0.190812
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.32.203]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <3039A296B3670E448A05F79F6182B767@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-08-28_08:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1908280163
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.70,1.0.8 definitions=2019-08-28_08:2019-08-28,2019-08-28 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1906280000 definitions=main-1908280163
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ntp/klOnJWYS6YdJ2Ac9VVJGU4gKqvM>
Subject: Re: [Ntp] Calls for Adoption -- NTP Extension Field drafts -- Four separate drafts
X-BeenThere: ntp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <ntp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ntp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ntp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ntp>, <mailto:ntp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 16:03:51 -0000

Whew, Christmas/Hannuka/Festivus came early. :)

I support adopting Anchal's roughtime draft; do we need a rechartering?

I support the Schiff chronos document, it should at least be a BCP if not proposed-standard updating 5905.

I support adopting the Gonts's (sic:) port randomization draft.

I share the concerns of several others about the four Stenn documents and would prefer that we re-chartered and worked on a new v5 protocol that assumes NTPsec and security as a base. Perhaps roughtime becomes part of it as well. I appreciate Harlan's efforts in trying to shoe-horn new capabilities into NTPv4, but the leather is too cracked to take more wear and we should think about what it would mean to move on. On a personal level, I regret saying this having known Harlan since UUCP days. :)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email