IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nvo3] I-D Action: draft-xia-nvo3-vxlan-qosmarking-01.txt

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Thu, 13 November 2014 19:49 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BB161ACE98 for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 11:49:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OY-6PJ60InIO for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 11:49:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yk0-x232.google.com (mail-yk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A91F61ACE95 for <nvo3@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 11:49:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yk0-f178.google.com with SMTP id 20so323438yks.9 for <nvo3@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 11:49:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=A4DjZ9gjWkgN/oMEFDEK0BfJ3DqPkdBJTDIYMGtbl2c=; b=OojvyiIsoGkM9LSM9auCjoEoWJWmYafAq58dbjTELgwzzyh1mrsxYqB3iOUzO/Znzx R9XOnhlJrTbjmaXhTaAu/Sl8zAxIrC58PHa9p8eJzKKxAlKI4F+vzco6cITZqhn5amYv ywTGddQPaccUwGOWjbOvdwha8Pp++m5E2SCDGFDt+w6Ut96NmoNCNvYXVWnhNKkPBqUh 0fu4tQDcb2/ojcmNBoiCxagef40+xjjTvT+O7KQ2hrlKmJrZeq4yECc7iPedTDvSkMQ4 hO9pU1ykKHY1IJ44OM1LOanann7FhvXupfkerbzZoarGJReCQ5dlDHdnN0zH7xrTNo1c JKWA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.236.203.130 with SMTP id f2mr5459316yho.91.1415908148005; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 11:49:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.170.71.198 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 11:49:07 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4F0C8596-E563-43DA-8AF1-07DE58610C2A@gmail.com>
References: <20141110200919.27869.2915.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5461854F.3020305@gmail.com> <CAC8QAce9kWVp_3+MeMcNpFinhnTcCgk0k1eDtip2j47iCWAbpg@mail.gmail.com> <CAC8QAceh3xPsg-ADthB8WuO2YgLpvso9HAGc1jHnPQ6jBoFk7w@mail.gmail.com> <5463B636.9020501@queuefull.net> <4F0C8596-E563-43DA-8AF1-07DE58610C2A@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 13:49:07 -0600
Message-ID: <CAC8QAcemHNpci3mvxY9=V4aR_uF5DB6a4eKQiO2XLivjE7xhog@mail.gmail.com>
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nvo3/2HKm8Bd459bEN_klRnraj9D8g8s
Cc: Benson Schliesser <bensons@queuefull.net>, "nvo3@ietf.org" <nvo3@ietf.org>, "draft-xia-nvo3-vxlan-qosmarking@tools.ietf.org" <draft-xia-nvo3-vxlan-qosmarking@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [nvo3] I-D Action: draft-xia-nvo3-vxlan-qosmarking-01.txt
X-BeenThere: nvo3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
List-Id: "Network Virtualization Overlays \(NVO3\) Working Group" <nvo3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nvo3/>
List-Post: <mailto:nvo3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 19:49:12 -0000

On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Specifically, one could imagine the NVE copying the IP1 DSCP codepoint into the IP2 header. Alternatively one could
>
> Exactly. Thanks Benson.

Dino, yes, but this requires DPI at the NVE, as we already talked
about in the draft as well as configuration to use diffserv.
RFC7348 does not mention any requirement for NVE to look beyond Inner
Ethernet Header into the Original Ethernet Payload in order to make
its encapsulation.

Regards,

Behcet

>
> Dino

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email