IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nvo3] I-D Action: draft-xia-nvo3-vxlan-qosmarking-01.txt

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Thu, 13 November 2014 21:03 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E071AD526 for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 13:03:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18AF4WOTAkC6 for <nvo3@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 13:03:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yh0-x22d.google.com (mail-yh0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A7131AD520 for <nvo3@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 13:03:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yh0-f45.google.com with SMTP id f10so1344166yha.4 for <nvo3@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 13:03:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=zN7WrDZ2tGa0JCtc1xnjLViFg8iZplCFEyyjVkQ48A4=; b=QkQasSZCssRtkPTydkkgyu+4vWZcJy44vifaqqqijNFmOKT3CE7r/kGeTcWIkucJGw FKDHyxcwlpd+a8nyycpYEdpMOt4iC/szCaGAjHmQr8SqjGoQqRnrLzvpD9YwkR8PWQt2 SSXff8Hl+VcDNX1yNR7Ofk2ojh0ggKYYIujoU8DbQR2Zkaj+P3lLqwY5/MdNTtzDjOlS GCmMVGu8T6nBJaoODVtc919GhEHEcbvNfbHmMthp8jEwZCqsZrkmJmxf/BzjfQWnmDei eDPSdAuXzjfpgRa1S6wvLEbCP2ZRDaStdDoDprYE1+a+lqWGVylqMMxyeAk4hyYWxvXB cOiA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.236.229.165 with SMTP id h35mr5648040yhq.129.1415912630860; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 13:03:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.170.71.198 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 13:03:50 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <182B38DB-6C67-44C5-803E-44F03A8EA787@gmail.com>
References: <20141110200919.27869.2915.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5461854F.3020305@gmail.com> <CAC8QAce9kWVp_3+MeMcNpFinhnTcCgk0k1eDtip2j47iCWAbpg@mail.gmail.com> <CAC8QAceh3xPsg-ADthB8WuO2YgLpvso9HAGc1jHnPQ6jBoFk7w@mail.gmail.com> <5463B636.9020501@queuefull.net> <4F0C8596-E563-43DA-8AF1-07DE58610C2A@gmail.com> <CAC8QAcemHNpci3mvxY9=V4aR_uF5DB6a4eKQiO2XLivjE7xhog@mail.gmail.com> <182B38DB-6C67-44C5-803E-44F03A8EA787@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 15:03:50 -0600
Message-ID: <CAC8QAcfvEYXEm+U1tJMVfNrzE7GLuFgvJ1Djvhw2TSrgO7FZdA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nvo3/KTiDoLEfpkADIeK2OSSo2Lqh8eQ
Cc: Benson Schliesser <bensons@queuefull.net>, "nvo3@ietf.org" <nvo3@ietf.org>, "draft-xia-nvo3-vxlan-qosmarking@tools.ietf.org" <draft-xia-nvo3-vxlan-qosmarking@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [nvo3] I-D Action: draft-xia-nvo3-vxlan-qosmarking-01.txt
X-BeenThere: nvo3@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
List-Id: "Network Virtualization Overlays \(NVO3\) Working Group" <nvo3.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nvo3/>
List-Post: <mailto:nvo3@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3>, <mailto:nvo3-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 21:03:54 -0000

On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Specifically, one could imagine the NVE copying the IP1 DSCP codepoint into the IP2 header. Alternatively one could
>>>
>>> Exactly. Thanks Benson.
>>
>> Dino, yes, but this requires DPI at the NVE, as we already talked
>
> No it doesn't.
>
>> about in the draft as well as configuration to use diffserv.
>> RFC7348 does not mention any requirement for NVE to look beyond Inner
>> Ethernet Header into the Original Ethernet Payload in order to make
>> its encapsulation.
>
> This is very simple. Let me sequence the steps on the encapsulator as well as the decapsultor:
>
> (1) A 802.1Q frame arrives at an encapsulator.
> (2) The encapsulator will encapsulate the frame with an outer IP header. It copies the EXP bits from the frame to the outer IP header TOS bits.
> (3) The decapsulator receives the IP packet, it strips the outer IP header and DOESNOT copy the TOS bits to the EXP bits of the frame because the TOS field could have been changed in transit. The EXP bits, set by the originating source are perserved.
>

Sorry there are no EXP bits mentioned in RFC 7348. MPLS is out of scope.
EXP is 3 bits long, DSCP is 6 bits and dividing it into two 3 bit
pieces, I am not sure if David will like it.

See also Brian Carpenter's comments.

Regards,

Behcet

> Dino
>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Behcet
>>
>>>
>>> Dino
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email