Re: [nvo3] Jim Guichard's No Objection on draft-ietf-nvo3-evpn-applicability-05: (with COMMENT)

[James Guichard <[e-mail]>]

Thanks Jorge looks good!

Jim

From: Jorge Rabadan (Nokia) <[e-mail]>
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2023 10:28 AM
To: James Guichard <[e-mail]>; The IESG <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; Sam Aldrin <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: Jim Guichard's No Objection on draft-ietf-nvo3-evpn-applicability-05: (with COMMENT)

Hi Jim,

Thank you very much for your review!
We have removed the "Conventions Used in this Document" as per Lars' comments, and updated all the references as per your request.

Thanks,
Jorge

From: Jim Guichard via Datatracker <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Date: Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 6:00 PM
To: The IESG <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Cc: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>, [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>, [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>, Sam Aldrin <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>, [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Subject: Jim Guichard's No Objection on draft-ietf-nvo3-evpn-applicability-05: (with COMMENT)

CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information.



Jim Guichard has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-nvo3-evpn-applicability-05: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nvo3-evpn-applicability/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

This is a nicely written document and I have no specific technical comments.
>From an editorial perspective:

- The placement of Section 6 "Conventions Used in this Document" is odd as it
appears after the conclusion section of the document. I would suggest moving it
closer to the beginning of the document. - There are several references that
are outdated so please correct these:

  == Outdated reference: A later version (-09) exists of
     draft-ietf-nvo3-encap-08

  == Outdated reference: A later version (-09) exists of
     draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-08

  == Outdated reference: A later version (-10) exists of
     draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df-09

  == Outdated reference: A later version (-09) exists of
     draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-mcast-07

  == Outdated reference: A later version (-05) exists of
     draft-ietf-bess-evpn-geneve-04

  == Outdated reference: A later version (-05) exists of
     draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mvpn-seamless-interop-04

  == Outdated reference: A later version (-06) exists of
     draft-sajassi-bess-secure-evpn-05

  == Outdated reference: A later version (-07) exists of
     draft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis-04