[nvo3] Jim Guichard's No Objection on draft-ietf-nvo3-evpn-applicability-05: (with COMMENT)

[Jim Guichard via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Jim Guichard has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-nvo3-evpn-applicability-05: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nvo3-evpn-applicability/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

This is a nicely written document and I have no specific technical comments.
>From an editorial perspective:

- The placement of Section 6 "Conventions Used in this Document" is odd as it
appears after the conclusion section of the document. I would suggest moving it
closer to the beginning of the document. - There are several references that
are outdated so please correct these:

  == Outdated reference: A later version (-09) exists of
     draft-ietf-nvo3-encap-08

  == Outdated reference: A later version (-09) exists of
     draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-08

  == Outdated reference: A later version (-10) exists of
     draft-ietf-bess-evpn-pref-df-09

  == Outdated reference: A later version (-09) exists of
     draft-ietf-bess-evpn-irb-mcast-07

  == Outdated reference: A later version (-05) exists of
     draft-ietf-bess-evpn-geneve-04

  == Outdated reference: A later version (-05) exists of
     draft-ietf-bess-evpn-mvpn-seamless-interop-04

  == Outdated reference: A later version (-06) exists of
     draft-sajassi-bess-secure-evpn-05

  == Outdated reference: A later version (-07) exists of
     draft-ietf-bess-rfc7432bis-04