Re: [nvo3] Second Working Group Last call for draft-ietf-nvo3-encap

Thank you!

Agreed, questions for DT.

Gyan

On Sat, Jul 3, 2021 at 2:44 PM Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Gyan,
>
> On Sat, Jul 3, 2021 at 11:25 AM Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Authors
> >
> > I have read the latest draft and support publication.
> >
> > This is a very important document for operators to help provide guidance
> on NVO3 directional encapsulation and what will be the eventual end all be
> all encapsulation which from the draft it sounds like GENEVE is out in
> front.
> >
> > Few comments.
> >
> > The draft mentions GUE but does not expand what GUE stands for.
>
> Sure, we can add the expansion of GUE.
>
> The questions below seem like they would be better answered by a
> member of the Design Team of which I am not.
>
> Thanks,
> Donald
> =============================
>  Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
>  2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
>  d3e3e3@gmail.com
>
> > As RFC 7348 VXLAN is the most widely of all deployments worldwide I am
> wondering why it is not listed in the NVO3 encapsulation types.
> >
> > Also RFC 7637 NVGRE as well has implementations by vendors and
> deployments by operators I wonder why that was excluded in the list of NVO3
> encapsulations examined.
> >
> > The goal of NVO3 charter is to have a single encapsulation type and
> GENEVE based on section 7 is the starting point for a proposed standard for
> NVO3 encapsulation.
> >
> > So let’s say NVO3 ends up being the chosen end all be all standard
> encapsulation type, what would vendors as well as operators do with
> existing VXLAN and NVGRE deployments and would those deployments eventually
> require software or I am guessing hardware upgrades to support GENEVE.
> >
> > It seems that out of the three encapsulation types in the draft, GENEVE
> was chosen as it builds on existing VXLAN framework with some added
> extensibility so not too difficult for operators migration in theory from
> VXLAN to GENEVE.
> >
> > Kind Regards
> >
> > Gyan
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 11:51 PM <xiao.min2@zte.com.cn> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Matthew and Sam,
> >>
> >> I've read the latest version of this draft.
> >> I think this document is valuable and ready for publication.
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Xiao Min
> >>
> >> ------------------原始邮件------------------
> >> 发件人：Bocci,Matthew(Nokia-GB)
> >> 收件人：NVO3;
> >> 抄送人：draft-ietf-nvo3-encap@ietf.org;
> >> 日 期 ：2021年07月01日 23:09
> >> 主 题 ：[nvo3] Second Working Group Last call for draft-ietf-nvo3-encap
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> nvo3 mailing list
> >> nvo3@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
> >>
> >> This email begins a two-week working group last call for
> draft-ietf-nvo3-encap-06.
> >> Please review the draft and post any comments to the NVO3 working group
> list. If you have read the latest version of the draft but have no comments
> and believe it is ready for publication  as an informational RFC, please
> also indicate so to the WG email list.
> >> We are also polling for knowledge of any undisclosed IPR that applies
> to this document, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with
> IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669  and 5378 for more details).
> >> If you are listed as an Author or a Contributor of this document,
> please respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of
> any relevant undisclosed IPR. The Document  won't progress without answers
> from all the Authors and Contributors.
> >> Currently there are no IPR disclosures against this document.
> >> If you are not listed as an Author or a Contributor, then please
> explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been
> disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
> >> As a reminder, we are pursuing publication of this document in order to
> permanently document the experience of one working group in choosing
> between multiple proposed standards track  encapsulation drafts. The idea
> was that this would provide helpful guidance to others in the community
> going forward.
> >> This poll will run until Thursday 15th July 2021.
> >> Regards
> >> Matthew and Sam_______________________________________________
> >> nvo3 mailing list
> >> nvo3@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > Gyan Mishra
> >
> > Network Solutions Architect
> >
> > Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com
> >
> > M 301 502-1347
> >
> >
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>*

*M 301 502-1347*