IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nwcrg] Should the group adopt draft "Coding and congestion control in transport"?

Cedric Adjih <cedric.adjih@inria.fr> Mon, 25 November 2019 14:40 UTC

Return-Path: <cedric.adjih@inria.fr>
X-Original-To: nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 760FE120926 for <nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 06:40:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AjZAOEQcfvDs for <nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 06:40:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3296120918 for <nwcrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 06:40:34 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,241,1571695200"; d="scan'208,217";a="413397162"
X-MGA-submission: MDH5a9iokCTK2vfRyUdnUWWJ8AN8GhuY+o5a8q9J3KbzORBWJitfQNtRlSztsMaZnF8Fupj36c0lZm3OW0vQXsXByn/Az8wV/EQ+vkGsZ7Vrbae0pjhTlCJesqTpfN2yA1uKsOXKxwyyzsXTfo1vKCUTfcSiKtZ+jZUwZyBJk35QNw==
Received: from zcs-store7.inria.fr ([128.93.142.34]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 25 Nov 2019 15:40:30 +0100
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 15:40:29 +0100
From: Cedric Adjih <cedric.adjih@inria.fr>
To: nwcrg <nwcrg@irtf.org>
Message-ID: <1873196848.12614344.1574692829618.JavaMail.zimbra@inria.fr>
In-Reply-To: <C80BE2B9-6B2F-4A3C-AF97-9DAEBBAACC9D@ifi.uio.no>
References: <F437B105-EDDA-4146-9067-A4BE557AC00D@inria.fr> <C80BE2B9-6B2F-4A3C-AF97-9DAEBBAACC9D@ifi.uio.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_88a438cb-c5a8-45c5-9ea5-209dcbdbafaa"
X-Originating-IP: [193.55.177.128]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.7.11_GA_3800 (ZimbraWebClient - GC78 (Mac)/8.7.11_GA_3800)
Thread-Topic: Should the group adopt draft "Coding and congestion control in transport"?
Thread-Index: DaSh3JlHFTDy0KIO91aHH0L9WFbllg==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nwcrg/NIp9vKW2TFHaSnmUrmgG6LoSZJw>
Subject: Re: [nwcrg] Should the group adopt draft "Coding and congestion control in transport"?
X-BeenThere: nwcrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Network Coding Research Group discussion list <nwcrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/nwcrg>, <mailto:nwcrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nwcrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:nwcrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nwcrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nwcrg>, <mailto:nwcrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:40:37 -0000

I am also strongly in favor of adopting this document as a RG document, 

best regards, 
-- Cedric 




De: "Michael Welzl" <michawe@ifi.uio.no> 
À: "Vincent Roca" <vincent.roca@inria.fr> 
Cc: "nwcrg" <nwcrg@irtf.org>, "Marie-Jose Montpetit" <marie@mjmontpetit.com> 
Envoyé: Lundi 25 Novembre 2019 15:18:44 
Objet: Re: [nwcrg] Should the group adopt draft "Coding and congestion control in transport"? 




BQ_BEGIN
I agree that this would be good to accept. 
Cheers, 
Michael 


Sent from my iPhone 


BQ_BEGIN
On 25 Nov 2019, at 19:10, Vincent Roca <vincent.roca@inria.fr> wrote: 


BQ_END


BQ_BEGIN

Dear all, 

It was suggested during ietf106 meeting to promote the following document as RG Item draft: 

Coding and congestion control in transport 
[ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-kuhn-coding-congestion-transport | https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-kuhn-coding-congestion-transport ] 

Many feedback have already been received during the meeting, mostly positive. We, co-chairs, 
also highlighted that this document has been long awaited. 

When asked whether we should adopt it, nobody objected among those physically or remotely 
(meetecho) present. We would now like to confirm this on the list. 

If you object to having this I-D be RG Item draft, please tell us by Monday Dec. 2nd. 

Cheers, 

Marie-Jose and vincent 

_______________________________________________ 
nwcrg mailing list 
nwcrg@irtf.org 
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nwcrg 

BQ_END


_______________________________________________ 
nwcrg mailing list 
nwcrg@irtf.org 
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nwcrg 
BQ_END

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email