Re: [nwcrg] Should the group adopt draft "Coding and congestion control in transport"?

Vincent Roca <vincent.roca@inria.fr> Wed, 04 December 2019 17:02 UTC

Return-Path: <vincent.roca@inria.fr>
X-Original-To: nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C118120856 for <nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 09:02:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 134n2KXW6XLc for <nwcrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 09:02:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FE601200CC for <nwcrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 09:02:14 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,278,1571695200"; d="scan'208,217";a="417743610"
Received: from moucherotte.inrialpes.fr ([194.199.28.14]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Dec 2019 18:01:38 +0100
From: Vincent Roca <vincent.roca@inria.fr>
Message-Id: <0C5016F3-4011-430B-8FFE-DEAB7BDFB6C1@inria.fr>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9048DBDD-E676-44E7-9EE5-F8D4BC5FC872"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 18:01:38 +0100
In-Reply-To: <F437B105-EDDA-4146-9067-A4BE557AC00D@inria.fr>
Cc: Vincent Roca <vincent.roca@inria.fr>, Marie-Jose Montpetit <marie@mjmontpetit.com>
To: nwcrg@irtf.org
References: <F437B105-EDDA-4146-9067-A4BE557AC00D@inria.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nwcrg/r4x1GuxgV4wdZWGvx1hoNpR7Ahc>
Subject: Re: [nwcrg] Should the group adopt draft "Coding and congestion control in transport"?
X-BeenThere: nwcrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Network Coding Research Group discussion list <nwcrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/nwcrg>, <mailto:nwcrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nwcrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:nwcrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nwcrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/nwcrg>, <mailto:nwcrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2019 17:02:17 -0000

Dear all,

We can confirm that this I-D is now RG Item document.
I suggest the authors immediately submit a new version called:
	draft-irtf-nwcrg-coding-and-congestion-in-transport-00
in order to reflect this new status.

A dedicated repository has been created in the NWCRG github page: 
	https://github.com/irtf-nwcrg/draft-irtf-nwcrg-coding-and-congestion-in-transport
For the sake of transparency, this is where all the work on this document should be commited.

Thanks.

   Marie-Jose and Vincent


@authors: (1) note the small change in the I-D name, in addition to irtf-nwcrg, adding « and » and « in ». 
		  (2) a dedicated github team has also been created to facilitate the work on the I-D.
		        You are all member of this team.


> Le 25 nov. 2019 à 15:09, Vincent Roca <vincent.roca@inria.fr> a écrit :
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> It was suggested during ietf106 meeting to promote the following document as RG Item draft:
> 
> 	Coding and congestion control in transport 
> 	https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-kuhn-coding-congestion-transport <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-kuhn-coding-congestion-transport>
> 
> Many feedback have already been received during the meeting, mostly positive. We, co-chairs,
> also highlighted that this document has been long awaited.
> 
> When asked whether we should adopt it, nobody objected among those physically or remotely 
> (meetecho) present. We would now like to confirm this on the list.
> 
> If you object to having this I-D be RG Item draft, please tell us by Monday Dec. 2nd.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
>   Marie-Jose and vincent
>