IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1216703] Expert Review for draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp (oauth-parameters)

Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 04 January 2022 13:19 UTC

Return-Path: <rifaat.s.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA253A1249 for <oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jan 2022 05:19:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X0hSs33Ksoa8 for <oauth-ext-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jan 2022 05:19:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm1-x329.google.com (mail-wm1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::329]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E4783A1245 for <oauth-ext-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jan 2022 05:19:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm1-x329.google.com with SMTP id a83-20020a1c9856000000b00344731e044bso1425281wme.1 for <oauth-ext-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Jan 2022 05:19:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TBaovVloI4o/5rhGwTNJG/rw7/ZIirw+3KRuY5prWxI=; b=MiOgRNDohlDyMiZgZ8i+JZap7U+123OcFHJQrKB82ca2bkMQ4ASEgmykDm73hgK+E8 u0joheGQQrWOh/9vcLr+TUAf4j1r7HfB4aJ9+801rstCGYJI3io6fMiqMzc+xSM4Rsgj IRHDFYLreN1WjXKliUr347CnWY8Ac35JwAOemCVAcHgGYyThu8pTOZcWRedqO2hIyKB/ VeaeLg5OMJJxhV8Q/xlGJ4Rz+Wb4KUGHlZZdED4/2SDzXeRDHrXsXhmrSFtuQW5Jh+JJ 1roj5mVPH6YMxeHEe61B1/9vw6JUlVQmalOHSkXP10ENMKJtGG/sdVYTJQnVygVH7Ia1 1xnw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TBaovVloI4o/5rhGwTNJG/rw7/ZIirw+3KRuY5prWxI=; b=T8Br8eyTxRuLo4BqeSE5NCRwwnjnjG285dYz0jPAmfiIexyhEUp4A4Yvyd2SBeUdVq i8BMDi0fWWepwL/ut6cB8ZSQh/5u+hA9Q8LgOr6SNlw3IZGWMSEdhz9HVUE1nLi4WZ1O T5PnkMextVzHaGceaTsNhGtsETEDBuODwcR/SYPOrqvCJClOkF+2nkG+wSnSSAGltXoK 8J3N8XeAJXY9hWX/hIASL34jpxTQmcDu/ds0ry2FjgM7VeEyKV8fBMSfySFlVDrB/vVv hEI59QUSVEqgb0B2d3+6MKwkPWmE8sc/t8jEGQDkLC7iUxXO0poZzD2HkDjsSZqwjPkI YSGA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530sGGDoqKnP+dQSVkfcMbZ+DZqCcr7hP9lNq7kHe+toVymQSt1k bkJjvQ/6cEXk85dVpBwTf4nrThfSeqRyYEa1EYc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzQtci/PuuHYRXXJQ2Qpc+K+avn0s6ApCrgpk1C4jhSHamIWObiTVymcg21i1TgpqD2ZQx35j/+gbPTG/LslsQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:f012:: with SMTP id a18mr41855732wmb.73.1641302388022; Tue, 04 Jan 2022 05:19:48 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <RT-Ticket-1216703@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-1907-1637090376-1238.1216703-9-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-16701-1641261440-386.1216703-9-0@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.4.3-16701-1641261440-386.1216703-9-0@icann.org>
From: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2022 08:19:37 -0500
Message-ID: <CADNypP9Y5LEuEv+RMcRGOpQft5PLSvfF2JKEMy+dvAVos_S6hw@mail.gmail.com>
To: drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org
Cc: oauth-ext-review@ietf.org, Mike Jones <michael.jones@microsoft.com>, nat@sakimura.org, John Bradley <ve7jtb@ve7jtb.com>, Dick Hardt <dick.hardt@gmail.com>, Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@arm.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cea17d05d4c17d11"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth-ext-review/f90pmhPl2TyemIYNrYQcwJY0f4Q>
Subject: Re: [oauth-ext-review] [IANA #1216703] Expert Review for draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp (oauth-parameters)
X-BeenThere: oauth-ext-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Review of proposed IANA registrations for OAuth." <oauth-ext-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth-ext-review>, <mailto:oauth-ext-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth-ext-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth-ext-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-ext-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth-ext-review>, <mailto:oauth-ext-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2022 13:19:55 -0000

Mike, Nat, John, Dick,

Can you please take a look at this to allow us to make progress with this
document?

Thanks,
 Rifaat


On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 8:57 PM Amanda Baber via RT <
drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> wrote:

> Attn: Michael, Nat, John and Dick (OAuth Authorization Server Metadata
> registry experts)
>
> Have you had a chance to review the request in this document?
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp/
>
> Is approval from all four experts required?
>
> thanks,
>
> Amanda Baber
> IANA Operations Manager
>
> On Wed Nov 24 21:27:25 2021, amanda.baber wrote:
> > Attn: Michael, Nat, John and Dick (OAuth Authorization Server Metadata
> > registry experts)
> >
> > I'm resending a review request for a document that's listed on the
> > next IESG telechat. Can you get to this before 12/2?
> >
> > Please let us know if approval from all four experts is required.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > Amanda Baber
> > IANA Operations Manager
> >
> > On Tue Nov 16 21:09:23 2021, michelle.cotton wrote:
> > > Mailing List/Expert Review requested
> > >
> > > Attn: Michael, Nat, John and Dick (OAuth Authorization Server
> > > Metadata
> > > registry experts)
> > >
> > > As the designated experts for the OAuth Authorization Server Metadata
> > > registry, can you review the proposed registration in draft-oauth-
> > > iss-
> > > auth-resp for us? Please see:
> > >
> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-iss-auth-resp/
> > >
> > > A single, new registration is being requested:
> > >
> > > Metadata Name: authorization_response_iss_parameter_supported
> > > Metadata Description: Boolean value indicating whether the
> > > authorization server provides the iss parameter in the authorization
> > > response.
> > > Change Controller: IESG
> > > Reference: [ RFC-to-be; Section 3 ]
> > >
> > > If this is request is OK, when the IESG approves the document for
> > > publication, we'll make the registration at
> > >
> > > https://www.iana.org/assignments/oauth-parameters/
> > >
> > > If you're the first expert to submit a review, please let us know
> > > whether you want us to wait for both reviewers to respond before we
> > > mark the document "IANA OK" (or send your comments to the authors, if
> > > the registrations aren't OK).
> > >
> > > The IESG has asked us to set a two-week deadline for registration
> > > reviews. The due date for this request is 2021-11-30.
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > >
> > > Michelle Cotton
> > > IANA Services
>
> _______________________________________________
> oauth-ext-review mailing list
> oauth-ext-review@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth-ext-review
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email