IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] JSON Web Token (JWT) Specification Draft

Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com> Fri, 24 September 2010 00:40 UTC

Return-Path: <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 519A03A688F for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 17:40:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.207
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.207 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.391, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AJV2d+U3VbLm for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 17:40:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.microsoft.com (maila.microsoft.com [131.107.115.212]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB883A6804 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 17:40:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TK5EX14MLTC104.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.79.159) by TK5-EXGWY-E801.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 17:40:51 -0700
Received: from TK5EX14MBXC202.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.2.28]) by TK5EX14MLTC104.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.79.159]) with mapi id 14.01.0218.012; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 17:40:53 -0700
From: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
To: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: JSON Web Token (JWT) Specification Draft
Thread-Index: Actbfov76Bkh7l/GQKOvG+24lxItYgAAlFTA
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:40:52 +0000
Message-ID: <4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394313F95EBD@TK5EX14MBXC202.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.123.12]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4E1F6AAD24975D4BA5B168042967394313F95EBDTK5EX14MBXC202r_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] JSON Web Token (JWT) Specification Draft
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:40:27 -0000

FYI, I've also posted this at http://self-issued.info/docs/draft-goland-json-web-token-00.html and http://self-issued.info/docs/draft-goland-json-web-token-00.xml for easy reference by those who didn't receive the original attachments.

                                                            -- Mike

From: Mike Jones
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 5:22 PM
To: 'oauth@ietf.org'
Cc: Yaron Goland
Subject: JSON Web Token (JWT) Specification Draft

Recognizing that there is substantial interest in representing sets of claims in JSON tokens, Yaron Goland and I have put together a draft JSON Web Token (JWT) spec for that purpose.

To answer the obvious question, while this was produced independently of Dirk's JSON token proposal<http://balfanz.github.com/jsontoken-spec/draft-balfanz-jsontoken-00.html>, both of us agree that we should come up with a unified spec.  Consider this an additional point in the possible design space from which to start discussions and drive consensus.  (If you read the two proposals, I think you'll find that there's already a lot in common, which is great.)

Thanks to those of you who have already given us feedback to improve the draft prior to this point.

                                                            Cheers,
                                                            -- Mike

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status