Re: [OAUTH-WG] Transaction Authorization with OAuth

Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net> Tue, 23 April 2019 05:06 UTC

Return-Path: <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 556CB1203D3 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 22:06:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0mD3paRFqGRp for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 22:06:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtprelay05.ispgateway.de (smtprelay05.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D58D1203D2 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 22:06:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [84.158.239.111] (helo=[192.168.71.105]) by smtprelay05.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <torsten@lodderstedt.net>) id 1hIndR-0007em-J9; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 07:06:25 +0200
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-64310AD6-C40D-420D-B3A3-C05A9FD1012D"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16E227)
In-Reply-To: <CAP=vD9u8ki=WzHr-VrLZcdU4nszNja5pgkB+4n2N+-xqCrpm=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 07:06:24 +0200
Cc: oauth <oauth@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <776A61E6-226C-434F-8D7E-AFF4D2E423E9@lodderstedt.net>
References: <8E2628D6-282A-4284-97E3-94466D71A75A@lodderstedt.net> <CAP=vD9u8ki=WzHr-VrLZcdU4nszNja5pgkB+4n2N+-xqCrpm=Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sascha Preibisch <saschapreibisch@gmail.com>
X-Df-Sender: dG9yc3RlbkBsb2RkZXJzdGVkdC5uZXQ=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/7Z2RqMjf7V5NMW3_DqjN1FpfHro>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Transaction Authorization with OAuth
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 05:06:30 -0000

Hi Sascha,

> Am 22.04.2019 um 20:34 schrieb Sascha Preibisch <saschapreibisch@gmail.com>:
> 
> Thank you for the article, Torsten!

my pleasure :-) 

> 
> I like that 'scope' is out of the game for these kinds of authorizations.
> 
> What I can see for the general use case is a required identifier
> within the 'structures_scope' document that identifies the profile it
> should be used for.

What does profile mean in this context?

best regards,
Torsten.
> 
> Thank you,
> Sascha
> 
> Am Sa., 20. Apr. 2019 um 11:21 Uhr schrieb Torsten Lodderstedt
> <torsten@lodderstedt.net>:
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I just published an article about the subject at: https://medium.com/oauth-2/transaction-authorization-or-why-we-need-to-re-think-oauth-scopes-2326e2038948
>> 
>> I look forward to getting your feedback.
>> 
>> kind regards,
>> Torsten.
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth