Re: [OAUTH-WG] Transaction Authorization with OAuth

Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net> Tue, 23 April 2019 05:24 UTC

Return-Path: <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973A11201B4 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 22:24:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YvTnr91uXAkU for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 22:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (smtprelay02.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E8B012004C for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Apr 2019 22:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [80.187.108.203] (helo=[10.17.208.76]) by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <torsten@lodderstedt.net>) id 1hInuY-00085g-68; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 07:24:06 +0200
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-4815A822-015E-4123-AA94-56ACDB8168FC"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16E227)
In-Reply-To: <7bca0d14-8644-ef2b-c33a-bd874fe8fb6c@connect2id.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 07:24:05 +0200
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <3F8277DE-270F-4883-93AB-0F58CE6FCDE8@lodderstedt.net>
References: <8E2628D6-282A-4284-97E3-94466D71A75A@lodderstedt.net> <7bca0d14-8644-ef2b-c33a-bd874fe8fb6c@connect2id.com>
To: Vladimir Dzhuvinov <vladimir@connect2id.com>
X-Df-Sender: dG9yc3RlbkBsb2RkZXJzdGVkdC5uZXQ=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/_eEWrqio8fpTkZFCryebYwCK5K0>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Transaction Authorization with OAuth
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 05:24:12 -0000

Thanks for sharing this recommendation!

> Am 21.04.2019 um 22:41 schrieb Vladimir Dzhuvinov <vladimir@connect2id.com>:
> 
> The proposed structured_scope fits nicely into the JSON object format of
> the request object.
> 
> At present for similar cases we recommend developers to encode the scope
> value into a URI with query string parameters, e.g.
> 
> https://scopes.myapp.com/sign?credentialID=qes_eidas&documentDigests.hash=sTOgwOm+474gFj0q0x1iSNspKqbcse4IeiqlDg/HWuI&documentDigests.label=Mobile%20Subscription%20Contract&hashAlgorithmOID=2.16.840.1.101.3.4.2.1
> 
>> On 20/04/2019 21:21, Torsten Lodderstedt wrote:
>> Hi all, 
>> 
>> I just published an article about the subject at: https://medium.com/oauth-2/transaction-authorization-or-why-we-need-to-re-think-oauth-scopes-2326e2038948  
>> 
>> I look forward to getting your feedback.
>> 
>> kind regards,
>> Torsten. 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth