IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-revocation-06

Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net> Sat, 13 April 2013 09:01 UTC

Return-Path: <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A388C21F8546 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 02:01:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.853
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.853 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dfe-9v1Gj1pN for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 02:01:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtprelay03.ispgateway.de (smtprelay03.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1557221F8540 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 02:01:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [79.253.8.253] (helo=[192.168.71.56]) by smtprelay03.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <torsten@lodderstedt.net>) id 1UQwLD-0008S3-I0; Sat, 13 Apr 2013 11:01:47 +0200
References: <51644F9A.9040402@cs.tcd.ie> <51687451.3020307@cs.tcd.ie> <51687697.3060602@mitre.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <51687697.3060602@mitre.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <23F39A94-54BE-4EA9-9792-66338CBA0A30@lodderstedt.net>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (10B329)
From: Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 11:01:47 +0200
To: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
X-Df-Sender: dG9yc3RlbkBsb2RkZXJzdGVkdC1vbmxpbmUuZGU=
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] AD review of draft-ietf-oauth-revocation-06
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 09:01:51 -0000

Hi all,

what do others think regarding a registry for token_type_hint values?

regards,
Torsten.

Am 12.04.2013 um 23:03 schrieb Justin Richer <jricher@mitre.org>:

>>> - 2.1: ought there be a registry for token_type_hint values? It
>>> looks like maybe there ought be.
> I think a registry is overkill for this kind of thing, but I suppose it could be set up. It's meant to be a *hint* to the server as to what kind of token it is. If it does get set up, the Introspection draft will use it (if that ever can get either pulled into the WG or moved through as an individual submission).

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email