IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OAUTH-WG] Signatures, Why?

Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net> Mon, 15 March 2010 22:50 UTC

Return-Path: <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51913A6C00 for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:50:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.415
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.415 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.167, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SderlV568hZz for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (smtprelay02.ispgateway.de [80.67.31.36]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006743A6BF2 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:50:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p4fff2416.dip.t-dialin.net ([79.255.36.22] helo=[127.0.0.1]) by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from <torsten@lodderstedt.net>) id 1NrJ70-0000Yx-R2; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:50:14 +0100
Message-ID: <4B9EB99F.1050609@lodderstedt.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 23:50:07 +0100
From: Torsten Lodderstedt <torsten@lodderstedt.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
References: <d37b4b431003041200n1fc6cc5au83194aca28763b0d@mail.gmail.com> <4B99B2DD.3000405@stpeter.im> <4B99D783.1090905@lodderstedt.net>
In-Reply-To: <4B99D783.1090905@lodderstedt.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030407010507030607010703"
X-Df-Sender: 141509
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Signatures, Why?
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:50:13 -0000

Hi all,

I composed a detailed summary at 
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/oauth/trac/wiki/SignaturesWhy. Please 
review it.

@Zachary: I also added some of your recent notes.

regards,
Torsten.
> I volunteer to write it up.
>> <hat type='chair'/>
>>
>> On 3/4/10 1:00 PM, Blaine Cook wrote:
>>    
>>> One of the things that's been a primary focus of both today's WG call
>>> and last week's call is what are the specific use cases for
>>> signatures?
>>>
>>> - Why are signatures needed?
>>> - What do signatures need to protect?
>>>
>>> Let's try to outline the use cases! Please reply here, so that we have
>>> a good idea of what they are as we move towards the Anaheim WG.
>>>      
>> This was a valuable thread. Perhaps someone could write up a summary of
>> the points raised, either on the list or at the wiki?
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>    
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>>    
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email