[OAUTH-WG] 2nd Call for Adoption: Authentication Method Reference Values
Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Thu, 18 February 2016 13:09 UTC
Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B6E1A1EFD
for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 05:09:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.206
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.206 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7,
RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id pZcBqhGisEPM for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 18 Feb 2016 05:09:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEA4F1A1EF6
for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 05:09:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.10.140] ([195.149.218.208]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101)
with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LlqNY-1Zx3Zh1YnY-00ZM7P for
<oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:08:57 +0100
To: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Openpgp: id=071A97A9ECBADCA8E31E678554D9CEEF4D776BC9
Message-ID: <56C5C273.30406@gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:09:07 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="BBdFCB3Kr4rhH9nLTPpkKbo3UBPFu0x5K"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:zUToVodNp7MRJ4qEw4dfbkPywcC+HHIZ9+y0AkfMT2Sg0p3LsMS
/rQAMNzj8/Q2CagSdOI07i9y07Y0Js/SBubcDRQoPwtYC087aMIQZ0dVRvvJhULoTi4QKWf
dLBgdLAeDCva0Iw0dxsEpQlniZr9hoXJWD0TYU7yRX10dPlILu/32tuvec1Dy3OmUPlEZvb
q3WyH6KIkhVZRq9olCYWg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:01CjVhK9PNI=:d3tYS9ssXLbVHtCddzEeok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Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/Xqdw7I94AtVVRVP7sJFO4aJWSq8>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] 2nd Call for Adoption: Authentication Method Reference
Values
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>,
<mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>,
<mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 13:09:03 -0000
In response to my message to the list regarding the initial call for adoption of the Authentication Method Reference Values draft, see https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg15694.html, Mike submitted an updated version of the document to take raised concerns into account. Several working group participants responded positively to the new version. We would therefore like to issue a 2nd call for adoption of the recently submitted version -05: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-oauth-amr-values-05 Please let us know by March 3rd whether you accept / object to the adoption of this document as a starting point for work in the OAuth working group. Ciao Hannes & Derek
- [OAUTH-WG] 2nd Call for Adoption: Authentication … Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] 2nd Call for Adoption: Authenticat… William Denniss
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] 2nd Call for Adoption: Authenticat… Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] 2nd Call for Adoption: Authenticat… William Denniss
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] 2nd Call for Adoption: Authenticat… Phil Hunt (IDM)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] 2nd Call for Adoption: Authenticat… John Bradley
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] 2nd Call for Adoption: Authenticat… Vladimir Dzhuvinov
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] 2nd Call for Adoption: Authenticat… torsten
- [OAUTH-WG] TR: 2nd Call for Adoption: Authenticat… philippe.clement
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] 2nd Call for Adoption: Authenticat… Mike Schwartz
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] 2nd Call for Adoption: Authenticat… John Bradley
- [OAUTH-WG] Conclusion ... was 2nd Call for Adopti… Hannes Tschofenig