[OAUTH-WG] 2nd Call for Adoption: Authentication Method Reference Values

Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net> Thu, 18 February 2016 13:09 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B6E1A1EFD for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 05:09:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.206
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.206 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pZcBqhGisEPM for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 05:09:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEA4F1A1EF6 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 05:09:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.10.140] ([195.149.218.208]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LlqNY-1Zx3Zh1YnY-00ZM7P for <oauth@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:08:57 +0100
To: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
From: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Openpgp: id=071A97A9ECBADCA8E31E678554D9CEEF4D776BC9
Message-ID: <56C5C273.30406@gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:09:07 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BBdFCB3Kr4rhH9nLTPpkKbo3UBPFu0x5K"
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:zUToVodNp7MRJ4qEw4dfbkPywcC+HHIZ9+y0AkfMT2Sg0p3LsMS /rQAMNzj8/Q2CagSdOI07i9y07Y0Js/SBubcDRQoPwtYC087aMIQZ0dVRvvJhULoTi4QKWf dLBgdLAeDCva0Iw0dxsEpQlniZr9hoXJWD0TYU7yRX10dPlILu/32tuvec1Dy3OmUPlEZvb q3WyH6KIkhVZRq9olCYWg==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:01CjVhK9PNI=:d3tYS9ssXLbVHtCddzEeok 8LWkRI9dvUW/XDydaAckdz63PPF1oPf9QTimBi2/Yg3FHAE6ox5naqp+MGWNY09aTG9IJv4Xi 5dG7mJsj7HU9ixbTiXb7AbYC6uLBuRLbxknmgopR9VU0Wfu7ncYa5wty3eAXj5XSBxL2vwyqH CtORdtUMJsITni4j6BZsSPcpTR1JZ/0cLKzmb/9w61JABByo8qKtFJtKT7LcU17a2N4W0Qer5 culPnHyumbk2l9HRmSxcd6BDqZ2NL2uGBVO3GCgSVlUGbCIMFtRPpa6cbxdRRpLpTOZkb+its /h3/pEqw2WuwQpIpHWDbBo0dI7JypjCWTonOhKEiXl+TnAURd6LN1VfNgrvtVeZGqQ6vMVzU6 1obb1UvKdRxuZaQDBkeEXuEKPuRfLkdWVXB/jsjUahVL6bnWgXi3i1NHkeTIPNOcmfv5YQbsh 5135UYl4qnbKdmzi9uTOC2+8VrVTw0DUPOhp/KIsm9+EnQVqZYoripYwd/vSSUY7wEPBvNsBs kCoPh4+D9IMb6Mf+7IpWcfk2x1GoPPGAni6Q7PWnpq8PMz2pky5MiiQQcWLnglCnefMw4ZejR QQPuK1J/Nza/o1B/5McXxE2pJ2R/VnC7aHXygR49ZQIn0lY555NS46sH6lJOmxVqUdRUXf1lh +rCdPKswVFBJIhQMnHt0PHFl85KD6Gjlhuw23gH5nza9akIBkPFLITfJZBvfafs4rjxv0o4Yh lnb2qVr2aSIQ47ZK/bzlmuMJ7OqPU4YBWL79PRQ9oXJqb722Evf7oCj9iNU=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/Xqdw7I94AtVVRVP7sJFO4aJWSq8>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] 2nd Call for Adoption: Authentication Method Reference Values
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 13:09:03 -0000

In response to my message to the list regarding the initial call for
adoption of the Authentication Method Reference Values draft, see
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg15694.html, Mike
submitted an updated version of the document to take raised concerns
into account. Several working group participants responded positively to
the new version.

We would therefore like to issue a 2nd call for adoption of the recently
submitted version -05:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jones-oauth-amr-values-05

Please let us know by March 3rd whether you accept / object to the
adoption of this document as a starting point for work in the OAuth
working group.

Ciao
Hannes & Derek